21–30 of 32 posts
http://numbersapi.com/1729/math "1729 is a plain old number." Can't recognize Hardy-Ramanujan number? Also the smallest perfect number: http://numbersapi.com/6/math "6 is the smallest number of distinct isosceles right triangles that will tile an isosceles right triangle."
> 1729 is the smallest number representable in two different ways as a sum of two positive cubes, as Ramanujan stated on the spot.
http://numbersapi.com/1729/math "1729 is a plain old number." Can't recognize Hardy-Ramanujan number? Also the smallest perfect number: http://numbersapi.com/6/math "6 is the smallest number of distinct isosceles right triangles that will tile an isosceles right triangle."
We're still working to build our database of facts. Feel free to send suggestions to numbersapi at google mail, and we may add a feature for user-submitted facts.
We will finally be able to answer humanity's most pressing question: what is the smallest uninteresting positive integer?
You can get a lot of number facts using Wolfram|Alpha and its API http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1729
We will finally be able to answer humanity's most pressing question: what is the smallest uninteresting positive integer?
223. EDIT: 219 is definitely smaller than 223.
That may be a stretch, but it qualifies as something interesting.
You can get a lot of number facts using Wolfram|Alpha and its API http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1729
http://numbersapi.com/1729/math "1729 is a plain old number." Can't recognize Hardy-Ramanujan number? Also the smallest perfect number: http://numbersapi.com/6/math "6 is the smallest number of distinct isosceles right triangles that will tile an isosceles right triangle."