GPT-Prompt-Engineer
11–20 of 166 posts
Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#12Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#13Should we really call it "engineering" if its a case of "try random things until one of them works without really knowing why"?
Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#14Should we really call it "engineering" if its a case of "try random things until one of them works without really knowing why"?
That's called machine learning.
Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#15Should we really call it "engineering" if its a case of "try random things until one of them works without really knowing why"?
But literally the first sentence of the readme is "Prompt engineering is kind of like alchemy."
Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#16Doug Adams would've had so much fun these days.
Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#17Should we really call it "engineering" if its a case of "try random things until one of them works without really knowing why"?
Looks more like science here. Run a bunch of experiments and see which does better. But literally the first sentence of the readme is "Prompt engineering is kind of like alchemy."
Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#18Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#19How are they actually ranked?
It seems like a `ranking_system_prompt` is used to rank the output of other prompts, which is pretty cool! > Your job is to rank the quality of two outputs generated by different prompts. The prompts are used to generate a response for a given task. You will be provided with the task description, the test prompt, and two generations - one for each system prompt. Rank the generations in order of quality. If Generation…
Re: GPT-Prompt-Engineer
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's called machine learning.
Gradient descent type optimization is far from "trying random things until one of them works without really knowing why". You can calculate all partial derivatives and understand the impact.