Live data from Hacker News

Induction: A Polyglot Database Client For Mac OS X

inductionapp.com

21–30 of 85 posts

Re: Induction: A Polyglot Database Client For Mac OS X

#23

Does anyone have an actual build of this? I just uninstalled XCode this morning and replaced it with Apple's new CLI dev tools, otherwise I'd try building it myself.

Builds are available at https://github.com/Induction/Induction/downloads .

Ah, nice, they weren't there when I first checked but now it's there. Thanks!

Re: Induction: A Polyglot Database Client For Mac OS X

#24
"for Mac OS X" breaks my heart, because this is exactly the kind of open-source DB client I want on Linux.

At least I can use this when I'm on my Air, but I recently went looking for a multi-DB client app like this for Linux, and this looks like what I was wishing I would find.

Re: Induction: A Polyglot Database Client For Mac OS X

#25
I wonder if this could be used to hook up something Excel-ish to a DB backend.

I use Excel frequently to model and ask "what-if" questions but I often wish I could store/retrieve information dynamically from a DB. (The ODBC connectors that Excel has leave much to be desired).

For my use case, that would be the holy grail.

Re: Induction: A Polyglot Database Client For Mac OS X

#26

Does anyone have an actual build of this? I just uninstalled XCode this morning and replaced it with Apple's new CLI dev tools, otherwise I'd try building it myself.

Builds are available at https://github.com/Induction/Induction/downloads .

The built copy only seems to support PostgreSQL and Redis, but the site mentions MySQL, SQLite, and MongoDB too. Is that coming soon?

Edit: I could have answered this question for myself by reading... Skimmed the line that explains that on the site and just caught it now. Oops ;)

Re: Induction: A Polyglot Database Client For Mac OS X

#28
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Builds are available at https://github.com/Induction/Induction/downloads .

The built copy only seems to support PostgreSQL and Redis, but the site mentions MySQL, SQLite, and MongoDB too. Is that coming soon? Edit: I could have answered this question for myself by reading... Skimmed the line that explains that on the site and just caught it now. Oops ;)

I didn't notice the note at first either. They should probably revise the whole sentence to make it clearer that it doesn't yet support those "out-of-the-box" instead of a note afterwards.

I'm yearning for the MongoDB support myself.

Post reply on HN