Live data from Hacker News

GitHub and Rails: You have let us all down.

chrisacky.posterous.com

201–205 of 205 posts

Re: GitHub and Rails: You have let us all down.

#201
I'm sorry, but this feels to me like an over-dramatized heap of bullshit.

First, the statement, "Rails. You clearly messed up." is self righteous bullshit at its finest. Rails didn't mess up; the programmer(s) at Github messed up. No conscientious developer lets the end user mass-assign variables carte blanche. But with that said, _every_ developer messes up every now and then despite their best efforts; some times they mess up in a big way.

Secondly, if a user discovered a vulnerability in something I wrote, and they handled it like homakov did, I'd ban the shit of them until I knew for sure that they weren't a threat.

Finally, Github handled this exactly the way many companies would handle it: it's called damage control. These guys are really good at what they do, they provide a great service and they offer-up a lot of their tools to the FOSS community.

Re: GitHub and Rails: You have let us all down.

#202
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I prefer to pay someone to host the private repos. Yeah, and people payed GitHub to host their private repos --how did that go?

It's going _just fine_.

Except when they don't handle security well, and you end up with anybody that feels like it capable of reading your private source code... Like, say, NOW.

Re: GitHub and Rails: You have let us all down.

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I think we'll migrate all our private stuff to http://gitlabhq.com/ The way GitHub reacted (blocking @homakov) is just wrong and destroyed all my confidence in them. Even more so when it was pointed out that @zedshaw crashed GitHub and didn't get blocked. http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1306816425.html Edit: Given that they have now stated that suspending @homakov was only temporary I no longer bear any ill will…

I actually wanted them to ban me for that, because then they'd have even more to explain about them allowing rape/abuse comics about me on their site: https://github.com/nickmartini/dongml Which has: https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com/img/b0de87a4cf0c... If I was a woman there'd be an international shit storm over that image, but I'm a dude, and one that TPW hates, so of course they won't do shit. Then again…

Wow this again Zed? Just can't let it go can you?

Re: GitHub and Rails: You have let us all down.

#204

I'm not sure if everyone noticed the last comment on this article: http://screencast.com/t/Nobted7zv5z Posted "almost 8 years ago" ie. posterous would appear to have the same vulnerability.

Ha! Alright he probably should quit doing that before he gets KimDotcom'd.

Russia has no extradition treaty with the US. He's fine.

Re: GitHub and Rails: You have let us all down.

#205

I have lost all trust in GitHub, and not because of the vulnerability, but because of their response. With their suspension of hamakov's account and deceptive blog post about the extent of the hole, GitHub has guaranteed that they won't be the first to know about the next vulnerability (and there's always another). I've downgraded my paid account to a free account, and won't keep any non-public data on GitHub in the…

I'm just going to latch on to this comment to make mention of a GitHub alternative for private repositories: http://repositoryhosting.com/ I've been a happy customer for a while now, and have seen them recommended on HN many times. You get unlimited repositories with unlimited users for less than the cost of GitHub's cheapest 5 repo plan. My open source code is on GH, but it's all also pushed to RH, along with all my…

Great recommendation, thanks! For others, I just signed up with this promo: SVN55 (50% off first month).
Post reply on HN