271–280 of 562 posts
>Developers wishing to continue using their fine-tuned models beyond January 4, 2024 will need to fine-tune replacements atop the new base GPT-3 models (ada-002, babbage-002, curie-002, davinci-002), or newer models (gpt-3.5-turbo, gpt-4). Once this feature is available later this year, we will give priority access to GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 fine-tuning to users who previously fine-tuned older models. We acknowledge…
not your weights, not your bitcoins
Earlier quoted context omitted.
One has to give them credit for what must be the most grandiose stunt actually landed. And on so many angles! “It just works” - they even got the scientists fully aligned! Fiercely smart industriousness. https://youtu.be/P_ACcQxJIsg?t=5946
No equity? For real? He really does need an agent if that's the case.
Promote and proliferate local LLMs. If you use GPT, you're giving OpenAI money to lobby the government so they'll have no competitors, ultimately screwing yourself, your wallet, and the rest of us too. OpenAI has no moat, unless you give them money to write legislation. I can currently run some scary smart and fast LLMs on a 5 year old laptop with no GPU. The future is, at least, interesting.
It's been a month or two since I've tried but the results were depressingly slow and useless for more or less every task I tried.
Every time a model is claimed to be "90% of GPT-3" I get excited and every time it's very disappointing.
(On that note, after using GPT-4, GPT-3 now seems disappointing almost every time I interact with it.)
>Developers wishing to continue using their fine-tuned models beyond January 4, 2024 will need to fine-tune replacements atop the new base GPT-3 models (ada-002, babbage-002, curie-002, davinci-002), or newer models (gpt-3.5-turbo, gpt-4). Once this feature is available later this year, we will give priority access to GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 fine-tuning to users who previously fine-tuned older models. We acknowledge…
If you don’t own the weights you don’t own anything. This is why open models are so crucial. I don’t understand any business who is building fine tuned models against closed models.
Promote and proliferate local LLMs. If you use GPT, you're giving OpenAI money to lobby the government so they'll have no competitors, ultimately screwing yourself, your wallet, and the rest of us too. OpenAI has no moat, unless you give them money to write legislation. I can currently run some scary smart and fast LLMs on a 5 year old laptop with no GPU. The future is, at least, interesting.
Practical report: the OpenAI API is a bad joke. If you think you can build a production app against it, think again. I've been trying to use it for the past 6 weeks or so. If you use tiny prompts, you'll generally be fine (that's why you always get people commenting that it works for them), but just try to get closer to the limits, especially with GPT-4. The API will make you wait up to 10 minutes, and then time out.…
(I'm an engineer at OpenAI) Very sorry to hear about these issues, particularly the timeouts. Latency is top of mind for us and something we are continuing to push on. Does streaming work for your use case? https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook/blob/main/examples... We definitely want to investigate these and the billing issues further. Would you consider emailing me your org ID and any request IDs (if you have t…
I had the silly idea of trying to change the signin method of my account. Which isn't possible. So I figured to just delete the account and create a new one with the correct signin method.
Turns out they don't delete anything. Both the email address and phone number are held hostage. As you try to create a new account, it will point out that those are in use. I can easily change my email address but not my phone number, I only have one.
I've contacted support 4 times, but it's just bot replies. There's entire Reddit threads full of us perma-banned potential customers. Money in hand, but permanently locked out.
What a ridiculous company.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We don’t actually know that it’s not legal. The copyrightability of model weights is an open legal question right now afaik.
It doesn't have to be copyrightable to be intellectual property.
It might have been a contract violation for the guy who redistributed it, but I'm not a party to that contract.
With this is the death of any uncensored usage of their models. Davinci 3 is the most powerful model where you can generate any content by instructing it via the completions API - chat GPT 3 models will not obey requests for censored or adult content.
A big enough hole presents a wedge for new entrants to get started. OpenAI will never fulfill the entire market, and their moat is in danger with every other company that has LLM cash flow. They want to become the AWS of AI, but it's becoming clear they'll lose generative multimedia. They may see the LLM space become a race to the bottom as well.
>Developers wishing to continue using their fine-tuned models beyond January 4, 2024 will need to fine-tune replacements atop the new base GPT-3 models (ada-002, babbage-002, curie-002, davinci-002), or newer models (gpt-3.5-turbo, gpt-4). Once this feature is available later this year, we will give priority access to GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 fine-tuning to users who previously fine-tuned older models. We acknowledge…