> Twitter knows that these employees previously worked at Twitter; that these employees had and continue to have access to Twitter’s trade secrets [...] This sentence is clearly trying to establish liability by accusing Meta of wilful infringement of Twitter’s rights (i.e. it acted in full knowledge of these fact, even though they may lead to violation of the employees’ restrictive covenants, etc.), as evidenced by t…
> As this is supposedly from such a large law firm
Is it the same law firm that went with the 'offering to buy twitter and signing a purchase agreement was just a prank bro' defence?
If you find yourself standing up in court making the prank bro argument, then I hope the amount of money you got was a fair price for your dignity.