Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you analyze news as something more like “a right to information” - “integral to the function of democracy”, I don't get it - in this analysis would my local coffee shop have to buy and provide free newspapers to me? I'm all for access to free press being a fundamental right. Where you lose me is the part where a private corporation is supposed to subsidize the production of news for me.
There's this understanding of rights that implies that the government/some other entity has to provide everyone willing with the object of the right. Usually applied to healthcare, education and sometimes dwelling, errors out on right to bear arms.
> errors out on right to bear arms.
Lol, in canada that is definitely not a right you have.