Live data from Hacker News

Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

threads.net

81–90 of 356 posts

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#81
It looks like you can't compose a new thread on desktop.

For a text-centric app, the lack of computer keyboard access is disheartening. I understand that the Threads team may want to focus on their core market on mobile. However, mobile prioritization will lead to posting content best composed on mobile, namely curt text and memes. I hope giving these types of content an early start won't affect the the culture on Threads in the long-run.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#82
post #30

I wonder how much the threads.net domain cost Updated Date: 2023-04-07T13:53:29Z Creation Date: 1997-05-27T23:00:00Z

I'd be surprised if it was more than $20k. Maybe in the $3-10k range? Seems to be the going rate. .Nets usually aren't that valuable, but I suppose if you have the network of Meta you can _make_ anything valuable.

Idk, if they need something quick, og owner might have said a price they thought was way to high, and FB just said, "yea ok". I'd prob put it in the 50-100k range, but wouldnt be suprised to see 500k-1m

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#83
I'm amazed that people are willing to give facebook another try.

Facebook filled our lives with rage-bait. (Not even going to touch the elections manip)

They took over instagram and removed the time based sorting with their algorithm.

So fool me once, shame on you. Fool me, you can't get fooled again.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#84
post #7

That feels oddly low. It was released at 5ish PM PST on a Wednesday, and considering they have literally all of Instagram + Facebook's userbase to push it on, it seems pretty low. The "sign up" was also just a "log in with FB/Instagram" button where the form was already auto-filled. So it's not like people had to convert, it's pretty much about as pure a product-market-fit test you can get. Discoverability is also pr…

> I don't want to necessarily block MrBeast, I just don't want to see him when I don't follow him.

I suspect Facebook are, at this point, culturally incapable of allowing you to just see what you've set to follow. As in, that four-panel gag meme that ends with someone being thrown out a window incapable.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but they have meaningful verification (apparently), while Twitter doesn't.

> Yes, but they have meaningful verification (apparently), while Twitter doesn't. Depends on what you mean by "meaningful". Threads uses Instagram's verification, which, like Twitter's, is now pay-to-play[0]. [0] https://about.fb.com/news/2023/02/testing-meta-verified-to-h...

I've never used Instagram, but I noticed all of the blue checks on Threads were famous people. Pay-to-play verification would kind of ruin it. Meta could have really built on their advantage over Twitter's blunders.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#87
I'm very skeptical that this will succeed. As with other extremely hyped social medias (anyone remember Clubhouse?) it's already filled with influencers and e-celebs trying to get in early, but these people always poison the well with insincere, low-quality, monetization-oriented content. AFAIK, every successful social media platform grew more or less organically and only had these folks latch on later (usually causing the degradation of the platform when they did).

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#89
post #7

That feels oddly low. It was released at 5ish PM PST on a Wednesday, and considering they have literally all of Instagram + Facebook's userbase to push it on, it seems pretty low. The "sign up" was also just a "log in with FB/Instagram" button where the form was already auto-filled. So it's not like people had to convert, it's pretty much about as pure a product-market-fit test you can get. Discoverability is also pr…

I opened it and immediately saw a post from GaryVee. Who was sanctimoniously instructing people to 'collectively be more civil'. Not a platform I want to use, but the App seemed decent; smooth UI animations, clean interface, simple onboarding with an overall decent UX. I think Instagram people who are Twitter curious will jump on it. If they can get Celeb style Tweets and memes without having to interact with the Gar…

My Twitter is full of two things - people doing exactly the same thing they were doing a year, two years, three years ago, and people saying how Twitter is such a dumpster fire now and everything is so bad and it's the end and Twitter will be dead soon (but they're still on it).

I'm not saying Twitter is going to be around 20 years from now, but I do think the reports of its death are greatly exaggerated.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#90
post #53

How is threads going to be different from Instagram? The tools available for content creators will be different but if I am just browsing they should be similar, no?

It's more text-oriented than photo-oriented, and it follows the Twitter convention of replies being the same "class" in the feed, rather than the Insta/FB convention of them being a small hierarchy off of the original post.
Post reply on HN