For a text-centric app, the lack of computer keyboard access is disheartening. I understand that the Threads team may want to focus on their core market on mobile. However, mobile prioritization will lead to posting content best composed on mobile, namely curt text and memes. I hope giving these types of content an early start won't affect the the culture on Threads in the long-run.
Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
81–90 of 356 posts
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#82I wonder how much the threads.net domain cost Updated Date: 2023-04-07T13:53:29Z Creation Date: 1997-05-27T23:00:00Z
I'd be surprised if it was more than $20k. Maybe in the $3-10k range? Seems to be the going rate. .Nets usually aren't that valuable, but I suppose if you have the network of Meta you can _make_ anything valuable.
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#83Facebook filled our lives with rage-bait. (Not even going to touch the elections manip)
They took over instagram and removed the time based sorting with their algorithm.
So fool me once, shame on you. Fool me, you can't get fooled again.
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#84That feels oddly low. It was released at 5ish PM PST on a Wednesday, and considering they have literally all of Instagram + Facebook's userbase to push it on, it seems pretty low. The "sign up" was also just a "log in with FB/Instagram" button where the form was already auto-filled. So it's not like people had to convert, it's pretty much about as pure a product-market-fit test you can get. Discoverability is also pr…
I suspect Facebook are, at this point, culturally incapable of allowing you to just see what you've set to follow. As in, that four-panel gag meme that ends with someone being thrown out a window incapable.
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but they have meaningful verification (apparently), while Twitter doesn't.
> Yes, but they have meaningful verification (apparently), while Twitter doesn't. Depends on what you mean by "meaningful". Threads uses Instagram's verification, which, like Twitter's, is now pay-to-play[0]. [0] https://about.fb.com/news/2023/02/testing-meta-verified-to-h...
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#86Is this working for people in Firefox? I can't get the site to work for me
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#87Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#88How is this any better than twitter when you still have to log in?
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#89That feels oddly low. It was released at 5ish PM PST on a Wednesday, and considering they have literally all of Instagram + Facebook's userbase to push it on, it seems pretty low. The "sign up" was also just a "log in with FB/Instagram" button where the form was already auto-filled. So it's not like people had to convert, it's pretty much about as pure a product-market-fit test you can get. Discoverability is also pr…
I opened it and immediately saw a post from GaryVee. Who was sanctimoniously instructing people to 'collectively be more civil'. Not a platform I want to use, but the App seemed decent; smooth UI animations, clean interface, simple onboarding with an overall decent UX. I think Instagram people who are Twitter curious will jump on it. If they can get Celeb style Tweets and memes without having to interact with the Gar…
I'm not saying Twitter is going to be around 20 years from now, but I do think the reports of its death are greatly exaggerated.
Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
#90How is threads going to be different from Instagram? The tools available for content creators will be different but if I am just browsing they should be similar, no?