Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
usebottles.com
Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
1–10 of 198 posts
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#2Why fix underlying problems when you can just put things in a bottle/container? Like that won’t use more resources.
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#3Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#4What’s the point of this isolated “bottle” concept? It seems like the bloated nature of containers is now pouring into emulation. Why fix underlying problems when you can just put things in a bottle/container? Like that won’t use more resources.
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#5What’s the point of this isolated “bottle” concept? It seems like the bloated nature of containers is now pouring into emulation. Why fix underlying problems when you can just put things in a bottle/container? Like that won’t use more resources.
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#6What’s the point of this isolated “bottle” concept? It seems like the bloated nature of containers is now pouring into emulation. Why fix underlying problems when you can just put things in a bottle/container? Like that won’t use more resources.
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#7What’s the point of this isolated “bottle” concept? It seems like the bloated nature of containers is now pouring into emulation. Why fix underlying problems when you can just put things in a bottle/container? Like that won’t use more resources.
You're juggling a dozen dependencies, some of which are closed-source binaries, some are blackbox replacements, and each game or application is a special snowflake requiring very specific versions of these (and perhaps some tweaks here and there).
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#8What’s the point of this isolated “bottle” concept? It seems like the bloated nature of containers is now pouring into emulation. Why fix underlying problems when you can just put things in a bottle/container? Like that won’t use more resources.
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#9What’s the point of this isolated “bottle” concept? It seems like the bloated nature of containers is now pouring into emulation. Why fix underlying problems when you can just put things in a bottle/container? Like that won’t use more resources.
Also since when were containers more “bloated” than emulation? The whole point of containers is that they don’t need to virtualise the entire stack because they are reusing parts of the host stack.
Re: Bottles – Easily run Windows software on Linux
#10(disclaimer: I work for CodeWeavers)