A header-only C implementation of C++
github.com
A header-only C implementation of C++
1–10 of 94 posts
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#2[dead]
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#3This looks like a good implementation for common array operations in a type-safe manner.
Not a bad approach, but the source (header file) is not very readable (so I guess "just like the STL" applies :-))
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#4I feel sick everything time when I see C++ related stuff, simple & fun programming got so complicated just because some big name "committee members" who insist to spend 30 years to standardize networking/filesystem/reflection refuse to simplify their craps. yes, they haven't got that completed yet.
I guess we can wait another 30 years and there will be a C implementation of the C++ reflection or networking?
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#5I feel sick everything time when I see C++ related stuff, simple & fun programming got so complicated just because some big name "committee members" who insist to spend 30 years to standardize networking/filesystem/reflection refuse to simplify their craps. yes, they haven't got that completed yet. I guess we can wait another 30 years and there will be a C implementation of the C++ reflection or networking?
> I guess we can wait another 30 years and there will be a C implementation of the C++ reflection or networking?
You don't really need to wait if you're willing to use Objective C with the GnuStep framework.
You'll get reflection, and a lot of other nice addons[1].
[1] Dunno about network support; ISTR it being part of the GnuStep framework, but could be wrong.
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#6I feel sick everything time when I see C++ related stuff, simple & fun programming got so complicated just because some big name "committee members" who insist to spend 30 years to standardize networking/filesystem/reflection refuse to simplify their craps. yes, they haven't got that completed yet. I guess we can wait another 30 years and there will be a C implementation of the C++ reflection or networking?
You can always just use Boost. I don't think I've ever worked on a C++ project that didn't use it!
std::filesystem = boost::filesystem - 1.30.0, 2003
std::optional = boost::optional - 1.30.0, 2003
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#7I feel sick everything time when I see C++ related stuff, simple & fun programming got so complicated just because some big name "committee members" who insist to spend 30 years to standardize networking/filesystem/reflection refuse to simplify their craps. yes, they haven't got that completed yet. I guess we can wait another 30 years and there will be a C implementation of the C++ reflection or networking?
God I wish everything was done in this way. Even the C standards committee moves too fast and adds features that have no place in the standard.
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#8Ah, one of those "generic" libraries back from MS-DOS days.
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#9Ah, one of those "generic" libraries back from MS-DOS days.
> Ah, one of those "generic" libraries back from MS-DOS days.
Nothing about this screams "MS-DOS".[1]
Why the disparagement?
[1] I know, I was programming at that time.
Re: A header-only C implementation of C++ <algorithm>
#10Isn't this a use-case for _Generic[1]?