Live data from Hacker News

A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

pewresearch.org

211–220 of 226 posts

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#211
I’m 40 and I’m pretty happy that I’ve never been married. I look around among my married friends and don’t envy anyone’s life. Which doesn’t mean they’d be better off not being married. I have no idea. It’s just that the alternative doesn’t have to be a bad thing at all. On the contrary.

But I guess one has to be the type for it. If one’s idea of a good life is marriage, then not getting to that point is obviously a problem which will create emotional struggle and subsequent issues.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this might get downvoted but honest truth, if you're living paycheck to paycheck, get yourself out of that situation first. I know its harsh but you have no business contributing to a relationship till you're able to take care of yourself beyond the bare minimum. Not only that but you can take the most risks to change your status quo when you're single. you don't have anyone dependent on you and no one who's time you…

> I know its harsh but you have no business contributing to a relationship till you're able to take care of yourself beyond the bare minimum. To clarify, you're saying no one earning less than 4x typical wages should be in a relationship. Did you date much in high school? > if you're living paycheck to paycheck, get yourself out of that situation first. So married couples who've hit hard times should do what, divorce…

> To clarify, you're saying no one earning less than 4x typical wages should be in a relationship. Did you date much in high school?

Couldn't get girls to look at me, much less date me in high school. And whatever amount of money you need to make is determined by the women you are trying to attract. I don't make the rules there but its on you to demonstrate your value to your potential partner in a way they can understand.

> So married couples who've hit hard times should do what, divorce and send the kids to foster care?

the original question proposed that you were single at the time. If you're already in a relationship and have responsibilities (ie: kids) that's different. You obviously can't abdicate preexisting responsibilities and I'm not suggesting that anyone do such a thing.

> Is it your opinion that there is an abundance of high paying jobs that accept degrees and certs from the University Of Sucked It Up And Educated Self?

why are you waiting for a high paying job? you should be focusing on developing a high earning skill. spend a few hours a day learning to code or maintaining linux boxes. you can get a minisforum pc for as little as $400 (I'm typing on it as we speak). coding isn't your thing? hop on fiverr and figure out what jobs are in demand. a lot of software like onshape is free to learn and plenty of places will hire you to use it. you won't make much money but you'll pickup useful skills that develop overtime. Hell I saw a youtube interview of a guy in his 20's making 10k MMR washing windows for clients he met going door to door. I'm not badass enough to do that but I'm not hungry enough to do it either.

If you are living in america, you're already setup with advantages that can put you ahead if you take advantage of them. using square or stripe, you can easily charge cards. through the internet, you can advertise services to people. you have cheap banking to store your money safely. getting an LLC means you can write off business expenses instead of paying taxes on them. hell, we have community colleges if you want to invest time in getting ahead.

In a perfect world, we'd have a safety net that subsidizes people who want to move up but you have to live in the world as it is. I had a minimum wage job in my 20's. At some point, something clicked and realized I would need to change something radically if I wanted to not be doing that for the rest of my life. So I stopped drinking with my coworkers and started spending my money on books instead. I would go to the cafe and practice web development. eventually I found a guy on linkedin who paid me $200 per gig on some small jobs. it wasn't much but it was enough to start getting some experience. eventually I got a fulltime job paying a salary maintaining websites. It wasn't much but it was enough that I was able to keep a consistent schedule. I kept studying and saved money for 4 years while sharing an apartment to save money. I did't eat meat. just rice, beans and veggies, cooked ahead of time.

with all that cash over 4 years, I sold off everything and flew to san francisco to do a coding bootcamp. finally after years of hard work, I could afford a descent place and wear nice clothes and I met my first girlfriend shortly after.

so I reiterate. if you're single and living paycheck to paycheck. GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER before you think about getting into a relationship.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do most college students have no support from parents and work minimum wage jobs?

Hard to say. All I have is anecdotal evidence. That does describe myself and all my friends in college.

How America Pays for College 2022 by Sallie Mae and Ipsos said 73% of students had support from parents.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

just out of curiosity, where do my allegiances lie? Interested to see how I come off?

Introvert and bachelor

Vs serial sexual harasser, I'll take it. Sorry you got so worked up over being called out amigo, you can still work on respecting other people though and better yourself. Good luck, me and all the women you think are asking for it, are pulling for you.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I know its harsh but you have no business contributing to a relationship till you're able to take care of yourself beyond the bare minimum. To clarify, you're saying no one earning less than 4x typical wages should be in a relationship. Did you date much in high school? > if you're living paycheck to paycheck, get yourself out of that situation first. So married couples who've hit hard times should do what, divorce…

> To clarify, you're saying no one earning less than 4x typical wages should be in a relationship. Did you date much in high school? Couldn't get girls to look at me, much less date me in high school. And whatever amount of money you need to make is determined by the women you are trying to attract. I don't make the rules there but its on you to demonstrate your value to your potential partner in a way they can under…

> Couldn't get girls to look at me.

Yeah. Spent more time there than not.

> And whatever amount of money you need to make is determined by the women you are trying to attract.

You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women. I grew up around those women and I know that that isn't remotely true.

> If you're already in a relationship and have responsibilities (ie: kids) that's different. You obviously can't abdicate preexisting responsibilities and I'm not suggesting that anyone do such a thing.

You've just advocated working one's way out of poverty while in a relationship.

> why are you waiting for a high paying job?

I never said waiting. That came from you.

> you should be focusing on developing a high earning skill.

Yes and I addressed that. You next toss out a number of niche jobs that only a small segment of the public is well adapted to. You offered up statistical anomaly as if window washing was a path anyone could take to a high salary.

You also fairly well hurdle-over the issue where the number of high paying jobs is a fraction of the working age population. Based on your assertion and it's underlying tone, if people are [NEGATIVE ADJECTIVE] enough to lose the employment lottery, they deserve being deprived of the supportive intimate relationships that successful people depend on to be successful.

> If you are living in america, you're already setup with advantages that can put you ahead if you take advantage of them.

We'll take this point on and assume we're discussing white, binary males without crippling health issues, the group it is mostly likely to be true for. For every community of men, who each work consistently hard and well, some eventually land in fortunate positions and some will not. This is reality in America.

For all other groups, the percentage who navigate America well and eventually land in fortunate positions will be less.

I believe I have one example of that dynamic, clever, opportunity seizing ideal you seem to have in your head, me. I talked and taught myself into a lifetime of technical jobs, mostly self employed. I spent a life pulling off the unlikely. I eventually wound up running IT for a region of car dealerships - until the 2008 crash. I pivoted and worked my way into medical support and the ACA put my indy medical clients out of business. I pivoted to corp medical, picked up some big clients and my wife became psychotic - and that led to a decade of my family living in frequent hunger.

A quick note that hiding poverty is mandatory while trying to mine life for opportunities (poverty spooks people). That effort consumes significant energy and resources, which are scarce.

One thing about survivor bias. It fairly well divides people who think they understand broad realities of life from those who do. Once I landed squarely on this side of it, I learned the millions who don't make it have stories a lot like mine.

The American Dream® mentality assumes that life will eventually run out of the worst circumstances, the ones that take down the most tenacious opportunists. For some that's true. For the rest, they learn that life can very well keep it up for 3 or 4 decades. Meaningful social safety nets can mitigate that and allow folks to escape feedback loops a lot sooner. But get that boost, folks have to live in states where those safety nets exist. I don't.

I did finally work my way out of extreme poverty (wife left to become homeless & vulnerable, which allowed the rest of us to make progress). By mid 2021 we had months of living expenses saved up. Yet, like other folks with money in the bank, we nearly became homeless because there was suddenly 1 rental available for each, I don't know - maybe 400 (maybe 1000) applicants. We did manage to beat astronomical odds again and am housed.

It was just in time to come up against ageism. For those of us here, some will succeed and my efforts will be as diligent as theirs. Even so, we all know we're competing for the same shrinking pool of opportunities - and connections aren't as powerful as they used to be.

> So I stopped drinking with my coworkers and started spending my money on books instead.

Sober at 22 and only spent on strict necessities for the next 30 years.

> but you have to live in the world as it is.

Yes. Knowing the world as it really is seems important too.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> To clarify, you're saying no one earning less than 4x typical wages should be in a relationship. Did you date much in high school? Couldn't get girls to look at me, much less date me in high school. And whatever amount of money you need to make is determined by the women you are trying to attract. I don't make the rules there but its on you to demonstrate your value to your potential partner in a way they can under…

> Couldn't get girls to look at me. Yeah. Spent more time there than not. > And whatever amount of money you need to make is determined by the women you are trying to attract. You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women. I grew up around those women and I know that that isn't remotely true. > If you're already in a relationship and have responsibilities (ie: kids) that's different.…

> You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women. I grew up around those women and I know that that isn't remotely true.

I didn't say that was the sole consideration but it would be wildly disingenuous to say its not a factor in the big picture. the only guys I've run into that managed to have relationships before achieving financial success were young white guys.

> You've just advocated working one's way out of poverty while in a relationship.

do you have an alternative suggestion? seriously. its a damned if you do/don't situation and I won't claim to qualified to answer that. I know guys who have moved up in the world from humble origins while having a family and they have all told me it would have been infinitely easier doing it on their own.

> You next toss out a number of niche jobs that only a small segment of the public is well adapted to. You offered up statistical anomaly as if window washing was a path anyone could take to a high salary.

what do you expect me to say? everyone should learn to code? I can't rattle off every possible option out there. my point is that if you're using your brain, you can find a way to carve out a niche that pays well. what that niche happens to be is going to vary according to the individual and beyond the scope of a HN post. Its less about being hand and more of a point that you have agency in whether you live in poverty or success.

> assume we're discussing white, binary males without crippling health issues,

fair point about the crippling health issue. but I am not white. I'm south asian an ethnic group confirmed by OK cupid in their own high level research to be the least likely group to get replies back from women on dating sites. If anything, I'm playing the dating game on hard mode. I'll even go so far as to say I don't personally know ANY south asian men in relationships with american girls who make less than 6 figures. Being a south asian guy making less than 100k is like being a white guy under 5'5".

> Based on your assertion and it's underlying tone, if people are [NEGATIVE ADJECTIVE] enough to lose the employment lottery, they deserve being deprived of the supportive intimate relationships that successful people depend on to be successful.

no one OWES you relationship. A relationship has its perks but its also a responsibility. Shit happens in life and we can't control that but you can take steps to secure the best position you can in life before you get into a relationship because you want whats best for you both.

> I did finally work my way out of extreme poverty (wife left to become homeless & vulnerable, which allowed the rest of us to make progress).

hope she and you are doing better.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#217
post #6

The trend of less education means less marriage is interesting. I think that tells me the root cause is that 25% of 40 year olds are not financially attractive mates. I think this speaks to a broader trend of men not being able to meet the traditional expectations of the breadwinner in an increasingly precarious economy.

>25% of 40 year olds are not financially attractive mates. Is this a peculiarity of the US? Income was never an issue when i got the hots for someone...especially when things turned into long-term commitment. In fact, quite the opposite.

Class and income are extremely important when it comes to marriage. It’s more important for women because they are looking for stability and safety for raising kids. It’s less important for men because they are the ones expected to provide. It’s common relationship stress when the woman earns more than the man.

Of course these are generalities, but they also fall out of the game theory of dating. For a woman, choosing a partner is extremely high risk as she will bear the children, will redirect energy away from her career to raise them, and will, most of the time, end up raising the children alone if the marriage breaks up. Men don’t really have any of those concerns because there’s not the same expectation they would raise the children on their own without help. I’ve known plenty of guys who ran out on the kids and zero women who left the kids with the guy.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you think inequality has any deleterious effects on society?

Of course. The question here is not one of whether wealth inequality is bad, but if we are living in the period of the greatest wealth inequality in all of human history.

Oh I'm aware, but it sure seems like trying to compare now to the Pharohs' time or whatever is more of a whataboutism than actually trying to address the issue. Though it is interesting to think that being considered a god amongst humans is perhaps an even greater inequality than material wealth. Still, I'd rather have air conditioning and regular bathing than whatever your historical despot of choice had to put up with.

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Couldn't get girls to look at me. Yeah. Spent more time there than not. > And whatever amount of money you need to make is determined by the women you are trying to attract. You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women. I grew up around those women and I know that that isn't remotely true. > If you're already in a relationship and have responsibilities (ie: kids) that's different.…

> You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women. I grew up around those women and I know that that isn't remotely true. I didn't say that was the sole consideration but it would be wildly disingenuous to say its not a factor in the big picture. the only guys I've run into that managed to have relationships before achieving financial success were young white guys. > You've just advocat…

I said: > You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women.

You replied: > I didn't say that was the sole consideration

Can you see how your reply doesn't rebut what I actually said?

Re: A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Couldn't get girls to look at me. Yeah. Spent more time there than not. > And whatever amount of money you need to make is determined by the women you are trying to attract. You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women. I grew up around those women and I know that that isn't remotely true. > If you're already in a relationship and have responsibilities (ie: kids) that's different.…

> You deliver this like it dwarfs all other factors considered by superior women. I grew up around those women and I know that that isn't remotely true. I didn't say that was the sole consideration but it would be wildly disingenuous to say its not a factor in the big picture. the only guys I've run into that managed to have relationships before achieving financial success were young white guys. > You've just advocat…

> it would be wildly disingenuous to say its not a factor in the big picture.

Not at all. The only women who prioritize a high income above more important considerations are those that happen to do that - and none other. Among the most capable and brilliant women I've known, that sort of computation isn't something I've seen with any regularity.

Post reply on HN