Is Harvard not allowed to admit the students they want? It’s the same situation in my local prestige college… very disproportionately slanted towards local kids that have been attending summer programs and the children of staff and faculty. So what?
43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
21–30 of 144 posts
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#22[flagged]
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#23Is Harvard not allowed to admit the students they want? It’s the same situation in my local prestige college… very disproportionately slanted towards local kids that have been attending summer programs and the children of staff and faculty. So what?
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#24Is Harvard not allowed to admit the students they want? It’s the same situation in my local prestige college… very disproportionately slanted towards local kids that have been attending summer programs and the children of staff and faculty. So what?
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#25This news is from 2019. Here is the published paper: http://public.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/legacyathlete.pdf
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#26> The study also found that roughly 75 percent of the white students admitted from those four categories, labeled 'ALDCs' in the study, “would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs,” the study said.
What’s ALDC? The article didn’t specify.
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#27Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#28Is Harvard not allowed to admit the students they want? It’s the same situation in my local prestige college… very disproportionately slanted towards local kids that have been attending summer programs and the children of staff and faculty. So what?
Universities like Harvard typically like to market themselves as being the height of meritocracy, going so far as to proudly declare their miniscule acceptance rates. It's hard to square that with a very obvious preference for students from a specific background regardless of merit.
This is how they market themselves to the general public, but everyone knows that Harvard and its admission policies were designed by and for the ruling class to educate their children and build connections. A Harvard degree would have no value if it selected based on merit alone.
A meritocracy would turn a school like Harvard into a factory for upper middle class people like doctors and lawyers and defeat its purpose. Harvard wants to educate presidents and CEOs.
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#29[flagged]
Citation? That'll be interesting, asking 10 Americans to define "liberal" will probably result in 12 definitions...
If you want to have a meaningful discussion, what do academic staff say about this selection criteria specifically, and/or affirmative action?
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#30> The study also found that roughly 75 percent of the white students admitted from those four categories, labeled 'ALDCs' in the study, “would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs,” the study said.
What’s ALDC? The article didn’t specify.