[flagged]
43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
11–20 of 144 posts
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#12Is Harvard not allowed to admit the students they want? It’s the same situation in my local prestige college… very disproportionately slanted towards local kids that have been attending summer programs and the children of staff and faculty. So what?
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#13Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#14Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#15Is Harvard not allowed to admit the students they want? It’s the same situation in my local prestige college… very disproportionately slanted towards local kids that have been attending summer programs and the children of staff and faculty. So what?
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#16[flagged]
It shouldn’t be a surprise both factions seek their material interests.
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#17> The study also found that roughly 75 percent of the white students admitted from those four categories, labeled 'ALDCs' in the study, “would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs,” the study said.
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#18> The study also found that roughly 75 percent of the white students admitted from those four categories, labeled 'ALDCs' in the study, “would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs,” the study said.
Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#19Re: 43% of white Harvard students are legacy, athlete, or donor/staff related (2019)
#20Is Harvard not allowed to admit the students they want? It’s the same situation in my local prestige college… very disproportionately slanted towards local kids that have been attending summer programs and the children of staff and faculty. So what?