Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
highscalability.com
Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
1–10 of 38 posts
Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#2Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#3Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#4Direct link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEpsKnWZrJ8
Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper
The fact that she wrote the first compiler is extremely impressive, but she also found the first bug... -- a moth.
Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#6Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#7Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#8Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#911.8 inch ... times about 2.5 is umm wait it's a link, maybe if I hover it, no they didn't put metric in the title tags either.
"In one millisecond, light travels 186 miles", which is about the same distance as a million squirrels put head-to-toe. Why not measure in squirrels? It makes about the same amount of sense, except that "one million" is a nice round number, unlike "186".
Re: Grace Hopper on nanoseconds
#10That first paragraph was as good as unreadable thanks to all the miles, gallons and Fahrenheits. 11.8 inch ... times about 2.5 is umm wait it's a link, maybe if I hover it, no they didn't put metric in the title tags either. "In one millisecond, light travels 186 miles", which is about the same distance as a million squirrels put head-to-toe. Why not measure in squirrels? It makes about the same amount of sense, exce…