wow. how would one even fix this without deliberate downtime? you'd have to deploy and hope that the frontend will make it through CDNs to reduce pressure, right?
Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
101–110 of 1001 posts
Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you know how many current Twitter engineers are on H1B? Is this based on some data, or just speculation?
Around 300. https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7z5px/twitter-employees-on-...
Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Twitter operates its own datacenters.
"Twitter and AWS signed a five-and-a-half-year contract in 2020, which AWS is not willing to renegotiate." https://gritdaily.com/twitter-owes-aws-millions/
Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#104One weekend Russia attacks Russia, next weekend Twitter attacks Twitter.
Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#105[flagged]
Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#106Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
It withstands being one of the first link on HN, and it still loads comfortably. For a personal website, that's a great performance.
HN traffic is not nearly the DDOS people make it out to be. I made it to spot #2 once and that was a few dozen hits per second at most. Maybe not something to serve with wordpress from a raspberry pi, but hardly apocalyptic levels of traffic.
Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#108This is interesting. Judging from the screenshot, a huge amount of GET /TweetDetail is generated which triggers some rate limiting, as shown by the 429. If this is indeed due to the recent decision to enforce authentication for all API calls, it means the curlprit may actually be the API gateway or something similar downstream. Also, this behavior seem to never stop, which isn't what one would expect from an exponent…
Re: Twitter Is DDOSing Itself
#109Meanwhile, I can see this very Mastadon post with no login just fine. And the interface is not trying to assault me. It loads quick. ...Seems like a better product than Twitter for a public feed.
I prefer Twitter in the sense that it's more laissez faire in terms of what kinds of speech get you banned.