Gping – ping, but with a graph
21–30 of 53 posts
Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#22I like the graph and being able to use multiple hosts. I could see some benefit to creating bash functions that use gping + cmd + curl since HTTPS will be reachable in more places than ICMP which is often blocked at the last few hops past a datacenter firewall and ICMP numbers can be misleading since most operating systems rate limit it and most routers deprioritize it based on backplane CPU load which has no bearing…
Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#23Really nice that it allows you to pass a list of hosts at the same time, and it will plot them in the same graph: For instance, `gping mydomain.com google.com` is really nice for a quick sanity check (is it my Wifi or my hosting provider).
Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#24Make sure you understand what MTR actually shows and why.
Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#25Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#26Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#27Really nice that it allows you to pass a list of hosts at the same time, and it will plot them in the same graph: For instance, `gping mydomain.com google.com` is really nice for a quick sanity check (is it my Wifi or my hosting provider).
It doesn't graph output, but does show connectivity , latency, packet loss, and variance on a set of hosts between your IP and the destination.
https://www.bitwizard.nl/mtr/>
(Previously noted in this thread by westurner: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36549005>)
Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#28Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#29On the rare occasion I need feedback while messing around with cabling. I did write an improvised tool for the purpose, but it's kind of crappy in that it's just around ping.
Behold the power of 'pingu': https://pastebin.com/qTfdZ7C8
Re: Gping – ping, but with a graph
#30How has there not been some basic image/data steaming built in, after all of these decades? Why am I writing scripts that parse human text output?