Live data from Hacker News

Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

techcrunch.com

311–320 of 1001 posts

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#311

[flagged]

Ever since twitter was bought, I deleted my account. I don’t want to be on the seasaw roller coaster.

I was just about to open one now. Not anymore. There used to be a lot of good stuff on twitter. Now it doesn’t matter.

I have a quora account, but I don’t use quora because it is difficult to use without account. I have a stack exchange account. But I never login.

I browser anonymously including HN. It’s nice this way.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's extremely rough around the edges but getting into fediverse content (mastodon, kbin, lemmy, etc) has been extremely rewarding to me. It's like twitter and reddit but 15 years ago (and by that I mostly mean it's janky and full of bugs. Just like the web was 15 years ago!)

How does fediverse intend to pay for server/developer cost? For new technologies many smart people work for free as long as it excites them and when it just comes to maintenance and fixing bugs it wouldn't be cheap for any technology with so many moving parts. Also, early adopters donate with much higher probability than when the masses arrive.

That's up for each instance to decide. Could be subscription, donation, I can't see why there couldn't be local (non federated) advertising

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#314

[flagged]

I got banned from Twitter for putting Elons image as my profile pic and tweeting a friend asking if he wanted a job. It was a dumb joke but I got banned

In the email, they said “Note that if you attempt to evade a permanent suspension by creating new accounts, we will suspend your new accounts.”

So now I’m 100% banned from twitter if I follow the rules.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#316

Musk commented on this: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1674865731136020505 "Temporary emergency measure. We were getting data pillaged so much that it was degrading service for normal users!"

What he means is "we can't deal with a regular amount of traffic because we fired most people, also we don't know the value of SEO"

They’ve done fine with these employees for the last while. Trimming the fat is healthy, especially when Twitter has historically over-hired hard for no reason other than “growth for growth’s sake”.

There’s lots of legitimate reasons to criticize, but making a more efficient company and firing valueless employees is not one of them.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#317
post #76

Paul Graham famously started to use Mastodon (but has not written anything there since last year). But the HN Status emergency “is HN down” channel is still only on Twitter. It used to be publicly readable at https://twitter.com/HNStatus >. But now, if HN was to go down, only logged-in Twitter users would be able to see why.

> But now, if HN was to go down, only logged-in Twitter users would be able to see why.

There may be a post about it in /r/sysadmin

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#319
post #110

This killed nitter. Fuck. I guess I'm done with Twitter. Reddit is in Eternal September. Twitter is login-walled. If HN is next, I'll probably be mostly done with the Internet. This version of the Internet is starting to suck. :(

It feels like the "natural" development of VC funded websites - they offer a service that's heavily subsidized and losing money hand over fist to displace other services (I guess in Reddit's case it was self-hosted forums and similar?).

But that's clearly not sustainable, it's inevitable they'll pivot to monetizing the service - and that's clearly going to make it less attractive than the heavily-subsidized version people have gotten used to.

I guess the ideas is to lock the users in to the degree that the increasing monetization is put up with, and slowly enough there's no "sticker shock" of a previously-free service suddenly having a price.

I'm constantly amazed people are surprised by this, isn't it obvious that tying to a loss-leader service isn't sustainable?

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#320

Musk commented on this: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1674865731136020505 "Temporary emergency measure. We were getting data pillaged so much that it was degrading service for normal users!"

Unless someone was pulling in everything to build a new AI dataset or something like that then I'm filing this in the "bots bots bots" stuff from the takeover - a real problem that is completely blown out of proportion.
Post reply on HN