Live data from Hacker News

Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

techcrunch.com

181–190 of 1001 posts

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#181

I wonder if we'll just start seeing people sharing accounts, and growing the (currently mostly underground) ecosystem around that. There will probably also be tons more abandoned accounts halfway through the registration process, as the last time I remember trying to register one, I was asked to provide a phone number and noped out immediately.

Inactive accounts is great for inflating mDAU. Ironically, Musk had railed against Twitter for that before.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#183
post #110

This killed nitter. Fuck. I guess I'm done with Twitter. Reddit is in Eternal September. Twitter is login-walled. If HN is next, I'll probably be mostly done with the Internet. This version of the Internet is starting to suck. :(

HN doesn’t really have a business model so I’m not sure how much it can be corrupted. I guess if YCombinator ever gets tired of paying the bills , but I’d imagine having a majority(?) of startup/tech employees visit your site almost daily is quite good for them in indirect ways

HN business model is to perpetuate YCombinator's culture. It's probably some of the most effective money YC spends.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Been over for a long time. We've had a lot of consolidation into Reddit (which, you can browse mostly anonymously, it will just beg you to death to log in unless you use the old site); and we've also had a mountain of consolidation into Discord (the most unsearchable system ever designed). People stopped hosting their own forums. Frankly, it's hard to not see why. The constant spam and people avoiding bans wasn't hel…

Reddit is under no obligation to continue supporting the old site.

Is anyone saying they're obligated to support the old site? I don't think that's a supportable inference to draw from people's observations that the new design is hot garbage.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#185
Reposting from another thread earlier.

---

I still have a few accounts I glance at from time to time. Hockey, Game Devs, Artists, etc. who haven't migrated away despite everything, so this is kinda obnoxious. I created some Redirector (https://einaregilsson.com/redirector/) rules to redirect Tweet and Twitter Profile URLs to their HTML embed equivalents.

Should be able to just import the rules and it seems to work alright with some caveats.

  * I have no idea if this will continue to function.
  * I've only tested some random links from my Discord and Slack groups.
  * Profile links only show the most recent 20 tweets.
  * Tweets will show quote-tweets, but no replies (though maybe that's a good thing).
  * Obviously won't work for mobile.
Rules are at https://gist.github.com/robotblake/a0f020381c1a919cf9720f9ae...

Edit: And just realized /u/justnotworthit posted the link earlier too.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#186
post #85

Ugh, what an eventful time of social media this has been. First Twitter API, then Reddit API, so today Apollo and many more Reddit clients shut down, and now Nitter. :-( I'm happy Lemmy is kind of taking off. I think it's helped more than Mastodon because it's less realtime/feed focused and slower paced. It also doesn't require you to form a friend circle to benefit. Instead, the community is waiting for you already.…

What is Lemmy?

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was confused at first on why a random dude posted a link to a screenshot hosted on Celso Azevedo's website (the Google Camera port index creator). Then I realized... hello there! (:

Hey! Yep, that's me. I was going to host the screenshot on imgur, but I'm not sure if we can trust them anymore...

They announced plans of only allowing sharing images with account and deleting all "unowned" ones.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#189
post #151

Uggh. I only use twitter to follow critical (life-and-death) emergency broadcasts from our local fire department. Is there a viable alternative for them to use now that twitter is going to block most of our county’s residents?

cell broadcast for real emergencies texts through registration on the site of the city hall, if cell braodcast isnt implemented by the phone company public emergency sirens radio TV actual website of the city hall local newspaper social fabric, with residents actually calling each others, for non emergency topics ? (Hacker news ?) Twitter has never been a great solution on its own. It could have contributed along wit…

Emails, too. That's how I get snow emergency alerts and bus notifications.

One disadvantage with all these is they're one-way. Twitter had reasonable ways to manage one-to-many conversations that other solutions lack.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#190
post #104
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it was definitely the "data pillaging" that was degrading service, and not the fact that Twitter is now hosted on a Mac Mini under somebody's desk...

" Don't be snarky. " " Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. " I'm not saying you owe CEO billionaires or billionaire CEOs better, but you owe this community better if you're posting here. If you'd please review and follow the site guidelines, we'd appreciate it: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html .

I'm a little surprised at this response, dang. I could understand if I was being hostile to the poster, but my sarcasm was directed at Musk (who they're quoting), whose comment about data pillaging I find highly dubious.

As far as snark, I see several other examples of that—also intended for Musk—in this thread. They don't strike me as either offensive or particularly constructive, so it's not clear to me why my comment was called out here. (Especially considering that there are a few other comments that definitely go beyond the acceptable levels of user-to-user snark as I understand them.)

I can avoid sarcastic comments about billionaires in the future, if that's a problem. If the issue was snark directed at another user, that wasn't my intention.

I'll also say that the "snark" rule you cited, while well-intentioned, seems very broad and selectively applied here.

Post reply on HN