Live data from Hacker News

Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

techcrunch.com

61–70 of 1001 posts

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#61

Musk commented on this: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1674865731136020505 "Temporary emergency measure. We were getting data pillaged so much that it was degrading service for normal users!"

So first of all HE scaled the infrastructure down to save money.

Secondly, that "data pillaging" was exposure, he just removed exposure from people's tweets to save money, again.

Good work Elon.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#63
post #48

A lot of comments suggesting federation as the solution to centralisation. I believe this is a false dichotomy. I think Write Once, Publish Everywhere (including both centralised and federated) is much better. https://indieweb.org/POSSE

How to do that in practice?

I find it tedious to update various social media platforms by hand, especially when each platform has its own rules and conventions. There are paid services that help but they often don't cover all of the platforms that I use, or are prohibitively expensive. Also if you just post a link to your site some social media platforms will treat you as a spammer.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#65

Putting the internet in the hands of corporations was the worst thing that ever happened to technology

I'm not sure that's a fair perspective.

Twitter made a convenient, easy to use, centralized (which is an absolute positive for user experience), social media product that attracted people, by their own free will. The number of people using a social media service amplifies its "usefulness", so the more people, the stronger it attracts new users.

We didn't put the internet in the hands of these corporations. We walked over and sat in their, easy to use, hands.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#67

And now imagine a citizen wants to quickly check news/updates/whatever from a government agency or a city council which doesn't have a fediverse account

Why the hell are government agencies using Twitter/Facebook for official communication in the first place? At the very least if these sites are being used for official communication that might be critical to peoples safety some sort of privileged status or ToS should be negotiated. Can you imagine Musk banning some random non-USA government agency because he had a fit while high at 3 am? Also: https://xkcd.com/743/

Musk has been deferential to governments to date, even when that flies in the face of his idea of a free speech platform.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#69
post #18

"Temporary emergency measure" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36540957

Same kind of speech as "special military operation"

The thing is if it weren't meant to be temporary I'd still expect him to undo it. Twitter is iconic, it's a big part of "the news" in a way. It just doesn't seem like it would be the same thing if it had exclusivity. So I'd expect them to reverse the decision after seeing the drop in engagement. Just like they did regarding the ban on promoting one's Mastodon account.

Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets

#70

And now imagine a citizen wants to quickly check news/updates/whatever from a government agency or a city council which doesn't have a fediverse account

Why the hell are government agencies using Twitter/Facebook for official communication in the first place? At the very least if these sites are being used for official communication that might be critical to peoples safety some sort of privileged status or ToS should be negotiated. Can you imagine Musk banning some random non-USA government agency because he had a fit while high at 3 am? Also: https://xkcd.com/743/

> Why the hell are government agencies using Twitter/Facebook for official communication in the first place?

Reach.

IDK if anyone is using it as the sole method of communication.

But Twitter in practice has a much higher reach than every other method.

Post reply on HN