Live data from Hacker News

Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

pubs.acs.org

191–200 of 320 posts

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe they should have wooden handles to hold or bottom part made of wood.

Sure, but now its not dishwasher safe because mold.

Mold is the reason wood isn't dishwasher safe? Dishwashers get very hot, I thought they damage wood by steaming it. But shouldn't the steam kill the mold?

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#192
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Aeropress will be releasing a premium version made out of glass later this year. https://coffeechronicler.com/aeropress-xl-premium/

Terrifying honestly, my aeropress experiences have always concerned me with if the mug can support the force. I know there isn't supposed to be a lot of force but I've used a few of these brewers and my experience is they're not super consistent! Hopefully glass is easier. I knew a barista who had a mug explode while using an aeropress, now imagine the brewer is itself glass as well during an event like that.

I helped a guy pick out cycling gloves one time when I was a mechanic. The palm of one of his hands was a wreck. I don't know if I pried or he volunteered it:

Slashed the hell out of his hand trying to push a stopper into lab glass. It broke and momentum carried his hand into the glass.

You might get lucky if a cylinder of glass breaks across the diameter in your hand. You will not get lucky if it breaks lengthwise under your hand.

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#193
post #3

I would love to read the full paper but it is gated behind paywall and I can't possibly pay for every article that I find interesting.

I've heard that a lot of the time the authors are happy to email you the paper directly, if you ask. Basically no one likes the academic paywalls, except for the world's most awful people [not an exaggeration].

I don’t like the academic publishing racket either, but that is an exaggeration.

Presumably you were being sarcastic, but it’s still caustic. What stereolab called easy cynicism.

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#194
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Terrifying honestly, my aeropress experiences have always concerned me with if the mug can support the force. I know there isn't supposed to be a lot of force but I've used a few of these brewers and my experience is they're not super consistent! Hopefully glass is easier. I knew a barista who had a mug explode while using an aeropress, now imagine the brewer is itself glass as well during an event like that.

Glass may impart more force upon the mug but it is certainly not likely to break itself. You would have to imagine they will use thick pyrex which you could use to drive a nail.

Pyrex won't save you from shattering a cylinder in your hand. And this is the 2020's. You won't imagine how dumb companies can be. Check.

If this is the guy:

https://coffeechronicler.com/aeropress-xl-premium/

Then the fact that the inner cylinder is stainless steel means that if the glass shatters, you still have something supporting your hand. The inner cylinder might save you from life-altering lacerations to your hand. Might.

I'm not going to be the one to trust it. I've seen how much pressure people apply to aeropresses, and friends don't let friends push that hard on future shards of glass.

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#195
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We use plastic containers largely for convenience. They're durable, malleable, and don't shatter like glass. They're also lighter and thinner, and cheaper. This makes them useful for things like takeout containers or any situation where you need to transport food. Borosilicate is more durable than regular glass. It's generally less prone to shattering, and it's also more tolerant of rapid temperature changes. As far…

> Borosilicate is more durable than regular glass. It's generally less prone to shattering, and it's also more tolerant of rapid temperature changes. You sure about that? I always heard that borosilicate was significantly less durable (30% is the figure I remember, not sure if that's 30% less or 70% less) and all the thermal shock resistance came from lowering the CTE. I don't know if that was a half truth from a sod…

A couple decades ago the employee at my local headshop raised the pipe I was looking at to shoulder level, and dropped it onto the wood floor. When it emerged entirely unscathed it felt like a magic trick and he said "it's pyrex" and ever since then I truly believe the material is magic.

That pipe lasted 20+ years until I lost it, meanwhile I broke at least 10 pipes of thicker normal glass. I dropped it in the sink and on the floor countless numbers of times when I braced myself for the sad cleanup, but it always survived.

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem with modern Pyrex and similar glassware is that it usually comes with a plastic lid. I'm with you in that I only use glassware to store food. But it's a bit annoying to have to put a little plate on top of the Pyrex as a makeshift lid in the microwave. My wife has an extensive collection of vintage Pyrex with lids, but she doesn't trust they're microwave safe.

Rather than putting a plate on top in the microwave, I have resorted to using a lightly dampened paper towel, gets the job done just as well and one less dish for me to clean.

Now I’m curious about the wet-strength resins in paper towels. Are they safe?

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#197
post #62

Slightly off topic but I threw out all my pots and pans with non stick surfaces. Nothing will convince me it’s safe to cook food to high temperature on whatever that chemical coating is. And after a while you notice the surface is wearing away…. where is it going? Into you and your family. All my pots and pans are stainless steel.

Most folks that cook a lot don't use non-stick pans much anyway because they just don't last very long. I keep a couple around for eggs and pancakes, but that's it. The usual recommendation for skillets is carbon-steel and cast iron because the seasoning does provide some non-stick properties. I have the full gamut with carbon steel, cast iron, non-stick and stainless steel, and find myself mostly leaning on the carb…

I think it's worth noting that the seasoning, while still a plastic and an oxidized oil and not necessarily good for you (probably bad or neutral), is not necessarily the same levels of bad for you that PFAS like teflon are when ingested. PFAS are called "forever chemicals" because they've been observed in our blood stream and don't naturally break down.

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or clumsy. Or a small child. Clumsy people and small children still need to eat, though.

One of them is synonymous. Clumsiness is a learned (or lack of) behavior, whereas children can be taught to be mindful of their actions. As a child who grew up in a poor Eastern European family, I was punished for my clumsiness, which led me to become an adult who pays attention to what he does. While I empathize with individuals who have significant cognitive deficits, I generally have absolutely no tolerance for th…

I’m pretty sure my clumsiness just came with my ASD.

Re: Microwaved plastic containers release microplastics into food

#200
post #59
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cast iron is also a good material and great for cooking. A nice complement to your steel collection.

What's the difference compared to steel?

It's a bit of a misnomer. Steel is literally Iron + Carbon.

So the carbon in carbon steel is redundant

Post reply on HN