YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
101–110 of 1001 posts
Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#102Or Vimeo, or Facebook, or TikTok, or ...
Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#103Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#104Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#105EDIT: I do wonder if the price point of youtube premium is too high to capture an audience that simply doesn't want ads but doesn't care about any other features. $6/mo feels higher than the typical per-user ad revenue.
EDIT2: While I don't know youtube's average revenue per user, both Facebook and Google's ARPU for the NA segment is ~$100-$200/y, which would put $6/mo quite close to the replacement cost of lost ads revenue.
Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#106Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#107Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#108I need to write something that uses yt-dlp to download videos and play as they download, then delete after it is no longer needed.
I occasionally use this for convenience, even though I pay for YT Premium.
Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#109Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers
#110I feel this was the inevitable outcome of the increased availability/popularity/awareness of ad blockers - a tragedy of the commons scenario that's set us on an escalating feedback loop that won't end well for anyone involved. EDIT: I do wonder if the price point of youtube premium is too high to capture an audience that simply doesn't want ads but doesn't care about any other features. $6/mo feels higher than the ty…