Live data from Hacker News

YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers

androidpolice.com

101–110 of 1001 posts

Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers

#105
I feel this was the inevitable outcome of the increased availability/popularity/awareness of ad blockers - a tragedy of the commons scenario that's set us on an escalating feedback loop that won't end well for anyone involved.

EDIT: I do wonder if the price point of youtube premium is too high to capture an audience that simply doesn't want ads but doesn't care about any other features. $6/mo feels higher than the typical per-user ad revenue.

EDIT2: While I don't know youtube's average revenue per user, both Facebook and Google's ARPU for the NA segment is ~$100-$200/y, which would put $6/mo quite close to the replacement cost of lost ads revenue.

Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers

#108

I need to write something that uses yt-dlp to download videos and play as they download, then delete after it is no longer needed.

Several media players will do that in the background for you, 'mpv' and 'vlc' come to mind. 'mpv' even has a sponsorblock script that will skip the sponsored segments if you so chose.

I occasionally use this for convenience, even though I pay for YT Premium.

Re: YouTube is testing a more aggressive approach against ad blockers

#110

I feel this was the inevitable outcome of the increased availability/popularity/awareness of ad blockers - a tragedy of the commons scenario that's set us on an escalating feedback loop that won't end well for anyone involved. EDIT: I do wonder if the price point of youtube premium is too high to capture an audience that simply doesn't want ads but doesn't care about any other features. $6/mo feels higher than the ty…

I'm okay with this if it means more platforms start to offer paid access with no ads. There are so many ad supported services out there that don't even have a paid option.
Post reply on HN