Live data from Hacker News

The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

windowscentral.com

21–30 of 155 posts

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#21
post #2

The main problem is that Microsoft is trying to use a WebView. If they really want a single cross-platform app, they should develop a native framework that will work everywhere instead of shoving everything into a web engine.

What I don’t understand is why the Electron-based desktop application is so bad, but the web client isn’t. Somehow they can make a usable web app but their all-webview client is trash.

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#22

At work I switched from the Outlook client app to the web version as soon as we migrated our email from on-prem Exchange to MS365 (cloud hosted). Specifically, I get my email at outlook.office.com. Works great in Safari and Chrome on Mac. Searching old emails is way faster and easier in the web version. It takes up no space on my machine, and there are not thousands of potentially sensitive emails sitting on the hard…

Occasionally I find myself somewhere I need to access email but have no network connection. No local cache means a big ol’ screw me

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#23
That article should be one line long:

The new Desktop outlook is a bad idea because it supports only Office 365 and not on-prem exchange.

(Which itself is a speculative claim with no substantiation except one anecdote)

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#24
post #16
post #2

The main problem is that Microsoft is trying to use a WebView. If they really want a single cross-platform app, they should develop a native framework that will work everywhere instead of shoving everything into a web engine.

vscode is an Electron app and is great and more responsive than its "native" competitor apps from JetBrains.

That's damning with faint praise, though, isn't it?

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#25
I've switched to Thunderbird after hearing about this a couple of weeks ago. I simply do not want yet another WebView/Electron-based application on my machine. They feel slow and out of place compared to native applications.

Microsoft, in the past 10 years, have failed to provide a good UI option for developers. WinForms is legacy. WPF is legacy. WinRT is dead. UWP is dead. MAUI is a mess. WinUI looks to be either abandoned or not getting enough attention to make it a viable option.

From the above, it is understandable why teams in MS are building new products with Web tech. The Windows team should consider this a failure because Windows now has no good, viable option for GUI development.

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#26
post #13

Can it inline quote emails properly on MacOS? The regular outlook client was still unable to do so in 2022, last time I tried. I have no idea why people would like Outlook, it's an inferior experience compared to other email clients and calendar applications in my opinion. I can't even have my personal gmail calendar imported into my work calendar so nobody can schedule meetings for me when I'm picking up kids from a…

Outlook + Exchange is the best example of email/calendar integration and group scheduling I've ever used, and I say this as a pretty devoted hater of MSFT. I mean, my daily environment is OSX, and I read most of my mail in the native Mac mail client, but I keep Outlook running in a VM to deal with calendaring and scheduling because it's so good at it.

There definitely ARE limits to it -- I've never tried to merge personal stuff into my work cal, as you seem to want to do -- but for what it does, it's the best I've seen.

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#27
We had a few users try it out before we had a chance to block it using Group Policy. It was an abysmal experience for those who opted-in, and I can't imagine it ever replacing the native client without massive backlash in its current state. It clearly caters to a subset of basic users who only send/receive individually. Shared calendars, shared mailboxes, rule management, plugins, etc. were all absent and are features that a majority of our users rely on day to day. There's clearly a huge gap between the folks working on this new version and the native app's userbase — and sadly, as we've all observed, that's becoming the norm with a lot of releases coming out of Redmond lately.

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#28
I would love if instead of replacing Windows Mail they just FIXED its email rendering. Windows Mail’s UI is far more touch screen friendly, decent and clean, VASTLY moreso than the new Outlook.

However the number of times I need to log into Gmail to see my email because it doesn’t render correctly in Windows Mail is just too dang high.

My intuition tells me Windows Mail is using the old pre-Blink Edge engine and if they could just switch that to new Blink Edge then that would make me so very happy.

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#29
post #15
post #2

The main problem is that Microsoft is trying to use a WebView. If they really want a single cross-platform app, they should develop a native framework that will work everywhere instead of shoving everything into a web engine.

They already have MAUI. I don't have direct professional experience with it, but the message I'm getting from those who have used it, is that it's cumbersome. With people instead just sticking with XF/Uno/Avalonia (Avalonia being closer to Flutter in how it doesn't actually tap into the platform's native frameworks).

Even if its cumbersome, it's still a win-win for them to use it.

The outlook app will be native desktop and mobile (except linux for now).

Plus it will give the maui project more credibility, help grow its userbase. Make the framework better by providing a real world project for the maui team to benchmark, highlighting pain point, provide in-house feedback, feature request.

Re: The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea

#30

I've switched to Thunderbird after hearing about this a couple of weeks ago. I simply do not want yet another WebView/Electron-based application on my machine. They feel slow and out of place compared to native applications. Microsoft, in the past 10 years, have failed to provide a good UI option for developers. WinForms is legacy. WPF is legacy. WinRT is dead. UWP is dead. MAUI is a mess. WinUI looks to be either ab…

The native views of thunderbird are wonderfully performant, especially when browsing thousands of e-mails in lists and sorting through them.

I'd never be able to go back to scrolling with "skeleton rows" that's the web default because it can't render fast enough..

Post reply on HN