Live data from Hacker News

The quest for a simple smartwatch

binarymoon.co.uk

111–120 of 232 posts

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#111
post #41

The new Casio DW-H5600 has solar charging and amazingly long battery life. I was pretty anti-smartwatch but i like g-shock squares and ended up getting it been surprisingly good.

I bought one of these for the solar charging, great battery life. And that works. But it is really hard to read the LCD. The automatic lightning works quite unreliably, and even when it works the tiny screen is hard to read. At least with my old man eyes.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#112
post #53

I really want a good health tracker with all the sensors of the Apple Watch but completely inconspicuous as smartwatches are ugly.

There's Whoop which is just a strap, but I've heard mixed reviews and I think it's a bit expensive. https://www.whoop.com/

It looks more like a subscription... with a strap.

Why can't I just buy the device? I can't manage anymore subscriptions.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#113
I've been on this quest and have tried almost everything you can name. Even bought a 3D printer so I could prototype my own and started reading electronics books to start putting one together myself.

... but then I bought a Garmin, sold the 3D printer, and can focus my time on other things. I loved my Pebble, but I feel like the Garmin Instinct and Fenix 7 is probably a no brainer. Just a shame that Garmin don't have Pebble's app ecosystem even though their API looks not that bad.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#114

The title should really be the quest for a cheap smartwatch with battery life, which seems to be what the author was looking for. The more expensive Garmin watches have excellent battery life and solar charging. I use a Garmin smartwatch. One of the surprising things about Garmin is that they don't have a proper app store. They have an app where you can load apps into your watch, but it's rather crippled by having no…

I am so satisfied with my Garmin Fenix. It's comically expensive, but it has been a dream compared to the Fitbits I used for years. Garmin has lots of lower-end watches, too, which would have resolved most of my headaches and many still have great battery life compared to the competition. I haven't touched the "smart watch" features, though. Garmin conducts themselves really well, too. They make good stuff and do lit…

I had a very strange, mixed experience with Garmin customer services recently. My watch died after 2 1/2 years. I'd heard that Garmin will, unofficially, replace broken watches for a bit longer than the official warranty (and so they should, because 1 year life expectancy would be terrible for a smart watch), so I contacted them.

The said they'd replace it for free and gave me a label to download (great!) However, I was travelling and the label wasn't valid for where I was. I asked if I could send it myself or get the label re-allocated when I got back (it had a time limit).

We then exchanged a dozen or so emails where Garmin CS kept ignoring my suggestions and giving me stupid instructions (terrible) until we eventually agreed they'd give me another label when I got back (ok).

I got back home and requested another label. CS demanded payment equivalent to the cost of a new watch (terrible!) I repeatedly asked why they were suddenly asking for payment when they'd previously offered it for free and they kept ignoring the question (argh!)

I'd have been much less annoyed if they'd just said up front that it was out of warranty, as then I wouldn't have wasted weeks and dozens of emails.

I eventually noticed that the original label still seemed to be valid, so I took up their original offer, sent my watch off and got an apparently new replacement within a day or two (great! I think.)

So, very mixed views! It's a lot like trying to write a Garmin app. They've got some nice API documentation (with a tutorial) but very incomplete as soon as you try to do something non-trivial.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#115
I recently got the Garmin Instinct Crossover with solar charging, basically if you turn off all the features that the OP did you get infinite battery life more or less. It functions as a normal watch with hands and can do most of the smart notifications. I've turned off all notifications apart from calls/messages so it doesn't constantly beep and have been very happy with it so far.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#116

I was fairly happy with my fitbit charge 4, but now it's actually useless as a watch most of the time because they pushed a firmware update that reduces the max screen brightness. So now it's impossible to read the screen outside, even on the max settings . God I hate closed down hardware. I don't actually care if the battery life gets shorter because I take the damn thing off every day to shower anyway, and the time…

This is why I loved my Pebble. The LCD screen meant it was readable in any light and also had fantastic battery life.

Transflective Memory-In-Pixel LCD screen. The Fitbit has a backlit LCD, like a TV, which sucks in daylight.

You can still get transflective displays on Garmin fitness/hiking watches. They're great, because they allow for always-on display with more than a month of battery life. Some of their new consumer products are OLED that wake up when you turn your wrist, but the core audience really likes the transflective displays.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#117

I was very very positively surprised by the Amazon smartwatches, I brought a amazfit GTS 2 Mini Fitness Watch, and it fulfill the main points of the article, it was very cheap also (65€). The app is nice, not perfect but does the job at tracking steps, the GPS is accurate, heart, stress levels, sleep, etc.. Perfect synch with the phone, I receive the phone notifications, good waterproofing and the battery last someth…

I have an Amazfit Bit U for 35€ and is everything OP wants.

They have nothing to do with Amazon though.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#118
post #8

I have not personally used, but looks like banglejs[0], a fully hackable watch with GPS and a good battery life (4 weeks claim) is proabably the best successor for Pebble [0] https://banglejs.com/

I have worn a Bangle.js daily for 2 years (I have both the original and the version 2). I really like the watch, it is easy and fun to program. But I'm not sure it's what OP is after. The requirements are: > Phone notifications (so I don’t miss calls/ texts) > Step counting > A long battery life Bangle.js doesn't connect to your phone at all, so you won't get any phone notifications. I don't personally use step count…

The Bangle most definitely connects to the phone and receives notifications. I used extensively at my last job and modified exactly this portion of the messaging code.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#119

I feel the new G-Shocks will fill this role quite well. Insane battery life, ruggedness, and now an improved MIP screen and smart features. I tested out and threw out smart watches. They are not for me. I love the freedom of a €125 dumb rugged square G Shock.

Which g shocks do phone notifications? My problem with the g shock line is it’s so expansive and hard to figure out which does what. The g shock website doesn’t allow you to filter by phone notifications…

I have a GBD-200. battery life is like 2 years lol. the notifications aren't the most reliable... sometimes it disconnects and I'm not sure why.

Re: The quest for a simple smartwatch

#120
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The third party app remembers the location when it last received pulse from the beacon that is in the car and when you open it, leads the user back to it. Disclosure: I actually happen to kno exactly how this feature works, as I added support for iBeacons in apps for iOS and Android in one of our projects. Not for the functionality described above, but for waking the app once a user walks to a proximity of a beacon.…

Afaik, iOS does save a location, and marks it as a parked car, when it looses the bluetooth connection to a device it identified as being a car. So no additional hardware needed for this to work.

It is a different thing, and we're talking mostly about androids.
Post reply on HN