Live data from Hacker News

US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

thehill.com

331–340 of 657 posts

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#331
post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would put weight on this if it were to re-occur. The navy has done lots and lots and lots and lots of drills since 2004. Nothing like this has magically re-appeared.

More recent videos exist - but they are classified. These objects are being picked up by navy pilots all the time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos

>More recent videos exist - but they are classified.

Aliens exist, but its classified. We're going in a circle.

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> if the government is forced to reveal it The government isn't even revealing the existence of search-warrant-type documents. Who do you imagine would have the ability to compel the revelation of a secret of this magnitude?

Congress could pass a law requiring it to be revealed, the president could order it, leaking of additional information could cause public outcry leading to one of the above. I'm using 'forced' in the sense of 'circumstances cause it to become necessary to do', not 'some more powerful entity will make them do it'.

I don't think the people allegedly involved in this alleged coverup have shown any respect for laws or norms. They can just keep lying and obfuscating. The only way they would ever disclose anything is if they wanted to.

We can't even hold some NIH administrators accountable for funding research that led to a pandemic. It's laughably naive to think that we could hold accountable, nevermind investigate, whatever faceless perpetrators are responsible for a government program cloaked in so much secrecy that not even presidents have been aware of it.

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nothing in that catalogue provides evidence of the government having exotic technology, the fundamental principles of which were completely unknown to the public. Governments can commission custom software and microchips and keep the details of those secret, but those things still operate on principles already known to the public; electronics, exploiting software, etc. When has this ever not been the case? Maybe gunp…

> Nothing in that catalogue provides evidence of the government having exotic technology It doesn't have to, it was a counter-example to that "decades behind the private sector on computing technology" thesis.

Okay fair enough. My comment is geared towards the larger context of people claiming the government has secret antigravity UFOs.

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#334

This is a push from Congress to force programs into the open that are secretly capturing Russian/Chinese UAVs right? Folks on the committees are angry that China is trolling US Navy vessels with UAVs and this isn’t being publicized. The “non-earth” origin is the smokescreen, “exotic” covers foreign secret research projects? Something a bit convoluted like this is orders of magnitude more probable in my world model. (…

>The “non-earth” origin is the smokescreen

Or, is the credulity in the US at such a high point that any sort of conspiracy idea has currency?

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#335

Ezra Klein just did a long interview with Leslie Kean (a popular author and Coast to Coast AM guest) about her article in "The Debrief" --- where it went, after the Washington Post wouldn't run it on her time schedule --- about David Grusch: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/20/opinion/ezra-klein-podcas... It does not make Kean and Grusch's claims sound a lot more credible. Some of Kean's sources are proponents of thin…

Another part is that people don't realize how within the government, and especially the military, there are a lot of false documents and reports that are sitting around AND highly classified. You do this because there are spies and they will steal shit. You want to make that process noisy. It's also beneficial because you may get your adversary to spend millions or billions studying a thing that isn't even possible.…

To add to this, I've noticed a lot of the material that gets declassified, that is purported to be evidence of aliens/psychics/magic/etc, is in the form of field notes or case studies that either contain full quotations or summaries of what someone else claims is true, but are not actually experiments or demonstrations of what is claimed.

For example, you might have a declassified CIA document that's being distributed as evidence of psychic phenomenon, but upon further inspection, you'll find isn't the case. What you instead see is documentation along the lines of "someone made a claim about X, here's what they say about X" where X can be "I can read minds" or whatever. At no point is there an actual scientific test of this, the document is just acknowledgment that someone said some outlandish things to government investigators. Then years later those notes are declassified and somehow become evidence that X really happened.

It's like reading a police report about someone who took too much methamphetamine and ran around claiming that they could fly, and then using that police report as evidence that the government knows people can fly.

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This does not track for me at all. I'm sorry but why would anybody in the DOD have an incentive to "make Americans believe in US military and intelligence superiority"?

Because one of the purposes of flying surveillance aircraft in US airspace is psychological warfare. It sends the message that China/Russia/whoever can send whatever they want into US airspace and there's nothing that anyone, including the military, can do about it. It sows fear, uncertainty and doubt in both the public and even members of the military who can recognize the advanced capabilities of the armies they mi…

I don't understand your comment. Russia has no real capability to fly surveillance aircraft over US territory. They can barely manage to fly to Syria without breaking down.

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#337

This is a push from Congress to force programs into the open that are secretly capturing Russian/Chinese UAVs right? Folks on the committees are angry that China is trolling US Navy vessels with UAVs and this isn’t being publicized. The “non-earth” origin is the smokescreen, “exotic” covers foreign secret research projects? Something a bit convoluted like this is orders of magnitude more probable in my world model. (…

Russia's documented strategy for foreign propaganda campaigns includes a few steps where you undermine people's trust in increasingly core pillars of society.

For example, they often start by undermining trust in media organizations, then elected leaders.

The current trajectory the US is on is indistinguishable from the successful outcome of a propaganda operation based on that playbook.

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> On 16 September 1994, there was a UFO sighting outside Ruwa, Zimbabwe.[1] Sixty-two pupils at the Ariel School aged between six and twelve[1][2] said that they saw one or more silver craft descend from the sky and land on a field near their school.[1][2] One or more creatures dressed all in black then approached the children and telepathically communicated to them a message with an environmental theme, frightening…

When I was a kid there was something known as the ‘Broad Haven Triangle’ in West Wales, UK One evening on the news there were reports of an alien spaceship landing next to the village school complete with interviews with kids A few years later I went to senior school with some of those kids and they told me they made it all up

Imagine throwing away the value of your word for such little gain.

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#339
post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More recent videos exist - but they are classified. These objects are being picked up by navy pilots all the time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos

>More recent videos exist - but they are classified. Aliens exist, but its classified. We're going in a circle.

?

'In September 2019, a Pentagon spokeswoman confirmed that the released videos were made by naval aviators, and that they are "part of a larger issue of an increased number of training range incursions by unidentified aerial phenomena in recent years".'

From the wikipedia article I linked to.

Further,

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/597039-how-governmen...

Re: US Congress doubles down on claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

#340
post #275
post #259

Still seems most likely this is a bunch of people feeding off each others’ hype and speculation. There are a dozen explanations more plausible than aliens.

"It's aliens" is just about the least plausible explanation other than "god did it". I'm pretty sure several other sci-fi bullshit explanations are more likely than "aliens are real, have tech we couldn't dream of that relies on our model of reality being totally broken, give enough of a shit about us to visit but not enough to do anything else, and are extremely hard to detect except, for no good reason, in this one…

I'd even argue that "breakaway human civilization living in underground bunkers on Earth" is more plausible than aliens, just because of the vast travel time required to move between star systems within the currently known laws of physics. Both situations - aliens and breakaway civilizations - are incredibly unlikely bordering on impossible. But at least one of them doesn't require breaking any laws of physics.
Post reply on HN