Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

pfas.report

21–30 of 155 posts

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#21

am currently deciding what to do next. That's what I was wondering, what do you do with this information? How do you narrow down where your exposure came from?

Maybe start donating blood regularly? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...

Doesn't this end up in some other poor sap then? Wouldn't you want to have the blood collected and destroyed as medical hazmat, along with testing to confirm burden reduction?

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe start donating blood regularly? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...

Doesn't this end up in some other poor sap then? Wouldn't you want to have the blood collected and destroyed as medical hazmat, along with testing to confirm burden reduction?

I think the guy that needs a blood or plasma transfusion is going to be much better off with it (even with the PFAS), than without.

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe start donating blood regularly? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...

Doesn't this end up in some other poor sap then? Wouldn't you want to have the blood collected and destroyed as medical hazmat, along with testing to confirm burden reduction?

The people that received your blood have most likely "destroyed" alot of their own which most likely also contained PFAS thats why they need yours. No need to deliberately throw away perfectly good blood.

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#25

This is interesting, and I suppose has a use of "data over time" but I fail to see how this testing is of any actionable value for the average person. So you're exposed, and PFAS is in EVERYTHING.... so ... what should I do? Nothing realistically. Unless I find an obvious source like my water, there isn't much I can do besides replacing my cooking pans. I can replace my pans without this test. It's a little like thos…

I think for certain high risk populations, specifically pregnant women or women planning on becoming pregnant, it makes sense.

Based on the new clinical recommendations, my 10.86 ng/mL level puts me at elevated risk for preeclampsia (if I were a women/pregnant). Knowing that could mean my BP during pregnancy is more closely monitored, with a BP cuff for example.

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe start donating blood regularly? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...

Doesn't this end up in some other poor sap then? Wouldn't you want to have the blood collected and destroyed as medical hazmat, along with testing to confirm burden reduction?

It depends on the need for the blood, I guess. Getting a nanogram of PFAS is preferable to dying from blood loss. The nanogram of PFAS increases you chance of dying 5% sooner by 20%, whereas losing all your blood through a wound guarantees a 100% chance of dying in the next 20 minutes. (All made up numbers, but you can see the risk/reward balance.)

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#28
post #25

This is interesting, and I suppose has a use of "data over time" but I fail to see how this testing is of any actionable value for the average person. So you're exposed, and PFAS is in EVERYTHING.... so ... what should I do? Nothing realistically. Unless I find an obvious source like my water, there isn't much I can do besides replacing my cooking pans. I can replace my pans without this test. It's a little like thos…

I think for certain high risk populations, specifically pregnant women or women planning on becoming pregnant, it makes sense. Based on the new clinical recommendations, my 10.86 ng/mL level puts me at elevated risk for preeclampsia (if I were a women/pregnant). Knowing that could mean my BP during pregnancy is more closely monitored, with a BP cuff for example.

That's fair. So like any other testing, this is only useful for a small population, and you should consult your doctor first.

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#29
post #8

>There's some research out of Australia indicating blood donation is effective at removing it from the body. Great. Another reason to regularly donate blood. And you don't even have to pay 399$!

Blood letting is back!

This made me audibly giggle. What's old is new again baby!

Re: Show HN: PFAS.report – Measure the forever chemicals in your blood via Quest

#30
Nice!

How can you interface with Quest diagnostics like this?

When you say that you are working to expand this to other locations what does this mean? Are you negotiating with other Quest labs?

The test is not approved by the FDA so why can they provide it?

Are you affiliated with the test provider or Quest in any way?

Post reply on HN