Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also use CCC — in addition to Time Machine, running on a tiny little SD card sitting flush inside the laptop. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1687325-REG/transcend... CCC is great, but it doesn’t back up in near-real time and doesn’t do versioning. It wouldn’t have saved my butt while I was on the road last Friday like “built-in” Time Machine in my SD slot did.
How reliable do you find it? I suppose if it's just for catastrophic emergencies, it will probably work through needing to use it. I'm guessing it will fail to write before it fails to read.
ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
181–189 of 189 posts
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also use CCC — in addition to Time Machine, running on a tiny little SD card sitting flush inside the laptop. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1687325-REG/transcend... CCC is great, but it doesn’t back up in near-real time and doesn’t do versioning. It wouldn’t have saved my butt while I was on the road last Friday like “built-in” Time Machine in my SD slot did.
How does this work with mounting/unmounting, power cycling, etc.
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've found that the ideal size of Timemachine drive is just about twice of the target drive. It last for months if not years -- enough to go back. Beyond that, there must be an archival/backup system in place if you still want to get back files deleted years ago.
In my experience there's no need to worry about long term disk usage of Time Machine. The backup is going to get in a bad state and start failing to add new backups, requiring you to wipe it and start over before the drive fills up.
Lately, for the last few years, I haven't had that problem.
Before TrueNAS I was using an M1 Mac Mini with a USB3 JBOD as TM destinations.
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#184Running TrueNAS on an ex-lease Dell Micro 7060 with a bunch of USB 4TB drives, is currently the best Time Machine destination I've ever used; fast, reliable, always available.
Do you have a ZFS pool on each drive?
I'm not confident with ZFS terminology, but here goes:
I have one TimeMachine Pool:
Then a single RAIDZ1 with 5x 4TB external USB3 drives connected via a powered TP-Link hub.
I'm aware this is suboptimal on a couple of fronts;
• USB Drives
• 5x drives in a RAIDZ1
• Standard RAM, not ECC
But the drives are what I had, and the 7060 Micro was super cheap ex-lease. I grabbed cheap used 32GB RAM from a local forum connection.
After seven months it's been super reliable, no issues.
I run 2x 515GB mirrored USB-C Samsung SSD drives as a VM-Pool, which is where I store my Linux VMs.
My Linux VMs run database backups, my Dashy Dashboard, a few Docker containers and general dev-ops experiments.
The 7060 itself has 32GB RAM and boots from mirrored 256GB internal SSD/NVME drives.
I should probably do a Blog post on the utility of Ex-Lease Dell Micros over going Raspberry Pi or similar. I'm a huge fan :-)
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my experience there's no need to worry about long term disk usage of Time Machine. The backup is going to get in a bad state and start failing to add new backups, requiring you to wipe it and start over before the drive fills up.
My anecdata is the opposite of yours. My backup history is over 15 years old! I started backing up using Time Machine when I got my first Mac in 2006. Migrated my sparsebundle from my first Time Capsule to another when I needed a bigger one, then migrated that to a number of other drives drives over the years (which thankfully never failed, but I replaced them every 4 years). Have successfully restored from a backup…
Up to a few years ago I was constantly hosing my TM drive and starting fresh.
TM has supported multiple destinations for a good long while, so in the past I was always running two TM destinations.
BTW, side note, with SSD prices crashing, I should be able to get rid of the spinning-rust and the luxury of silent local SSD TimeMachines running!
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#186Is anyone else using borgbackup on their Mac? It lets me dedupe across OSes and computers, better than Time Machine. I’ve been using it for years and have accumulated some paths to exclude in my home folder, but constantly unsure if I should be excluding some other system metadata.
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would you be able to share those scripts? Or if not, an obfuscated/abstracted version of them? I use brew but even with brew and brew cask, I find there's plenty of GUI apps that require manual installation, which will also have their own config spread out in various places, plus whatever CLI or background stuff I've installed myself (mostly hidden files/directories in my home folder so probably easier), system setti…
Unfortunatly, they contain too much sensitive information to provide them online and I don't have the time to make them nice and clean (it all started with a 50 lines bash script). But there are plenty of users providing macOS RICE / dotfiles... Just a short search: https://www.lotharschulz.info/2021/05/11/macos-setup-automat... https://gist.github.com/bradp/bea76b16d3325f5c47d4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFlnqS…
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was trying out Restic (through auto-restic) this weekend. And I really wanted to make it work. However, I have 2 user accounts on my macOS (mine and spouse’s) and I couldn’t get Restic to access the other account’s data. I am admin, I ran Restic as root, gave it “full disk access” - still couldn’t make it work. Any tips?
Why not use 2 repos?
Re: ThinMachine – A $25 thin client macOS Time Machine appliance
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me it was more like every day. I gave up on Time Machine very quickly. The underlying problem is that Time Machine stores a disk image over the network[0]. If the disk image is not unmounted cleanly, Time Machine treats it as horribly corrupted and refuses to touch it. And this happens very often if you're using a laptop that will be unexpectedly disconnected from its storage constantly. [0] This is to support th…
I've given up on it and bought a SSD to do local backups. My new plan for the Synology is to get Minio running on it and then use Arq Backup to send the data.