You may not like this answer but you asked and that is my reason.
I think about advertising 50 times less than I think about cookie warnings.
71–80 of 159 posts
You may not like this answer but you asked and that is my reason.
I think about advertising 50 times less than I think about cookie warnings.
Ad blockers are rules for thee, but not for me. As software engineers many of us play a part in creating a world that we wouldn't want to live in and then exempt ourselves from it with ad blockers leaving the ignorant or less technically inclined to fend for themselves. It unethical to use ad blockers. I could not imagine using the internet without an ad blocker and despite trying to live an ethical life, that's one…
Is it unethical to use a computer that isn’t associated with you? (And thus have no ad profile?) If I get a untargeted ad, am I stealing?
Why? Because I believe they're wrong. I think it's just wrong to engage with any business and disable, sidestep or circumvent their way to make money. It's like shoplifting. It reminds of people who open up a box at the supermarket, eat the food, and then claim that the barcode was on the box so that must be what's for sale. I want the Internet to have ad supported content. I want the people who create this content t…
Saying that ad (aka surveillance) based businesses are "undermined" by adblocking carries a fallacious assertion that those businesses have some inherent right to exist as they want. In reality, nobody is entitled to a business model. From my perspective, "freeloaders and thieves" describes those who have built businesses around attempting to hijack attention spans and create surveillance profiles about users. The fundamental dynamic of the Internet has always been that servers represent the server owners' interests, and my user agent chooses how to interpret what is received in my own interests. The Schelling point of the protocol is what separates the authorities/concerns of two parties with diverging interests.
It then morphs into a dancing dashboard mannequin, a personal avatar, spouting nonsense, getting on your nerves, while its technoneurons spread, root-like, tapped into you. As you exit the car going into the supermarket, the supermarket is now a construct of the avatar not the bricks and mortar building it was when you were growing up. It exists for the avatar to make your life better, not for you, it robs you of choice and agency it does not agree with.
You go into a small cafe for some splice. It has a touchscreen display to order from, you must pay with a card or ApplePay.
My wife doesn't, simply because Android Chrome doesn't support one and she won't move to Firefox because it doesn't have an extension to translate pages with Google Translate like Chrome does :(
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I fail to see how having your navigation riddled with ads is useful. Learn the lesson that ads suck, don’t add any to the « internet stuff » you’re building, install an adblocker and move on?
I’m just not finding that ads suck that much. Things like mandatory cookie dialog boxes annoy me a lot more.
All in all i spend about $30/month to not have ads while supporting the sites I use, which I think it's pretty reasonable.
My wife doesn't, simply because Android Chrome doesn't support one and she won't move to Firefox because it doesn't have an extension to translate pages with Google Translate like Chrome does :(