Price increases here are in energy and groceries. In plenty of other things of course, but those are the two big ones hitting almost everybody severely. Most have already optimized their energy usage (some to the point of sitting in the cold) and optimized for more cost-effective grocery shopping.
And that's it. Energy and food are not very elastic beyond this. One can hike rates all they want but people need energy and food. The demand will not reduce, hence inflation cannot be lowered this way?
Further, if a rate hike is supposed to be a stimulant to save instead of spend, then why is savings interest at 1%? It's like setting your money on fire.
What you'll see happening is that the lower classes spend for not having a choice whilst middle class and higher keeps spending as they always did. If saving is a losing game, why not?
The normal result of a rate hike, elevated unemployment, isn't happening. We have a labor shortage instead. Hence this too will not curb demand.
It would seem obvious that energy prices are at the core of this. Hence, one way or another they have to be lowered. But then again, doing so would increase demand.
Yes, I'm totally lost.