If you've spent much time on the forum, you've seen that it isn't all it is cracked up to be. You are spending £21.60 on caseless slow computer using ARM that has not been tested adequately in beta and that has to be hooked up via HDMI to be much good. So basically, it is a crappy, overly slow, wrong architecture, barebones media streaming computer. If you want to spend that much money, spend a little more and get a full system that is faster and more useful.
Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#2Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#3As if that's a downside in a computer that costs less than 30 euros?
Price comparison: if I spend 30 € at an Apple retailer, I get a DisplayPort->HDMI adapter. It doesn't include an ARM-based computer at all.
Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#4I'm sorry but any computer and Codecademy will do that.
It's a poor piece of hardware that is using its price point as the trump card. However, I don't think expensive hardware is the problem.
Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#5Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#6Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#7£21.60 is not a great deal of money - but even if it was, it still won't buy you much ;)
Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#8Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#9I'm not sure what's wrong with HDMI: my MacBook Pro connects to my monitor with HDMI as that's what the monitor supports. ARM architecture seems fine on every phone out there (and elsewhere) and as I'll likely be programming small programs in C for the device I don't think the architecture is going to get in my way.
As for speed considerations I've done a lot of things with Arduino and they are _slow_ compared to Raspberry Pi.
Re: Tell HN: Don't waste your money on a Raspberry Pi
#10I agree that this thing is underpowered - a Beagleboard would be a better investment, since its at least beefy enough to support having its own development environment onboard. I run mine as a normal Linux workstation, no cross-compiling required, gcc+cscope+vim+gdb is onboard of course, and its been a productive environment for years ..
I find the idea interesting, how normal is it as a workstation? Can you run X with a windowmanager and a graphical browser at a decent speed?