Live data from Hacker News

Debris Field Confirmed as Titan

independent.co.uk

1–10 of 187 posts

Re: Debris Field Confirmed as Titan

#4
post #3

What can we learn from this? Don't go in pressure vessels; don't go in confined spaces.

I mean I think the bigger take away is to not cut corners when operating with such a small margin of error as DSVs. Safe deep-sea exploration is possible, and has been for a long time, in manners such as the DSV Alvin, DSV Limiting Factor, etc., etc. The manner in which the Titan was made and tested indicated a severe lack of safety oversight from OceanGate. As unfortunate as this is, there's the saying that rules are written in blood, and this is yet another case. I doubt there will be many such cavalier attempts at deep sea exploration and tourism in the future as a result, for the better.

Re: Debris Field Confirmed as Titan

#5
post #3

What can we learn from this? Don't go in pressure vessels; don't go in confined spaces.

That's a gross oversimplification. There have been multiple vessels that have successfully explored the sea floor.

What set them apart was a distinct lack of SV VC-level "move fast and break things" bullshit and utter reckless disregard for safety.

Re: Debris Field Confirmed as Titan

#9
The outcome everyone knew would happen. I don't understand the desire to go to that depth to see a sunken ship when I presume there is camera footage of it available. You can't get out and do anything, your view is probably pretty crappy given the thickness of any see through material. I see the allure with Everest and the view for your 60 seconds at the top must be impressive and it is a physical feat. But a sunken ship? I don't get it.

It would be pretty cool to send down a camera to get footage all around it at various angles and then build an app for a VR headset.

Post reply on HN