31–40 of 233 posts
Perhaps we’re starting to see the limits of the machine learning era in AI. We may have nothing more to teach it. There are a number of ways to go from here, none of which is entirely within our control or understanding.
The next evolution needs to be HFML.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Usually labeling text/images, answering simple questions, ranking or scoring.
How does one find this as side job? sounds like a therapeutic work once in a while :)
Nothing new here. Because of laziness human beings just love a Confirmation bias. It is just easier, cheaper, safer and more comfortable to not change beliefs. Without control, AI will reflect that.
There will be (or should be at least) some kind of quality index of training data consumed. Companies could wear it like a 'quality' badge. Just not sure how you would do it.
Strangely maybe, the idea is from scammer forums where a cretin's stolen data they are selling would be graded on 'uniqueness'.
Perhaps we’re starting to see the limits of the machine learning era in AI. We may have nothing more to teach it. There are a number of ways to go from here, none of which is entirely within our control or understanding.
There are countless books that haven't been digitized.
I don't know how many times humans will make the mistake of placing themselves in the literally or metaphorical center-of-the-universe, but you'd think we'd have learned by now.
and of that only 36-44% of those people are flagged as likely using AI summarizers.
Doesn't this play into the whole "Snake eating it's own tail" scenario.. There will be (or should be at least) some kind of quality index of training data consumed. Companies could wear it like a 'quality' badge. Just not sure how you would do it. Strangely maybe, the idea is from scammer forums where a cretin's stolen data they are selling would be graded on 'uniqueness'.
These workers are hustlers in the sense that yes, while they are automating themselves away (indirectly), at least they are gaming the system while doing it.