Live data from Hacker News

The Reddit blackout will continue

old.reddit.com

561–565 of 565 posts

Re: The Reddit blackout will continue

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit has replaced mods before, they'll do it again. If they can't do it for hundreds of subs at once, that's fine - they'll start with the largest ones and go from there. Once it becomes clear that top mods will be removed if the subs don't reopen, the protest will largely crumble, if it doesn't do so before this becomes necessary.

The power mods that are pushing the blackout run something like 80% of the entire site. I honestly don't see how they allowed this to happen in the first place.

It will be a good thing that they are removed then.

Hardly irreplaceable

Re: The Reddit blackout will continue

#562

Honest question since I don't really know how reddit works: Why can't reddit just forcefully re-open the subs that have been taken private? Mods are using powers given to them by the platform and I don't get why they are not being stripped of (some of) those powers.

They can, they just don't think it'll be necessary.

[flagged]

Re: The Reddit blackout will continue

#563

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can, they just don't think it'll be necessary.

[flagged]

you are confusing an assertion on the status quo with a prediction about the future.

I also have a prediction somewhere else in the thread tho, so I can still be wrong :)

Re: The Reddit blackout will continue

#564

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The confusing sign up seems to be a huge friction there.

I don't see anything confusing. Choose any instance and it will federate with others. For the minimal friction, choose the mainstream one, mastodon.social.

I'm glad that it works for you. The experience shared by many others, however, and that includes many commenters on HN, is different and would suggest that it is, indeed, confusing.

Re: The Reddit blackout will continue

#565

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Enough with the ChatGPT already. If you didn't write it, don't post it.

I thought the approach was interesting. It's being used here as an empathy engine: what might (other people) say?

Thanks.

Most everyone seems to have missed the point, of the copy paste.

My goal was to show how trivial it would have been for the CEO to have typed that into chat gpt and avoided the injury of unforced errors. Sort of a modern “let me google that for you.”

I had this written out for the comment but at the time couldn’t make my explanation add more to the simple provision of “what you get when you try this using present tech” and a simple prompt and response.

Another way to look at it is that LLM queries and their responses serve almost like ultra niche links to the docs except their responses vary and may even be transient.

Providing a simple one could be read like RTFM.

Post reply on HN