Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
1–10 of 166 posts
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#2Google warns staff about chatbots
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36341188 (107 comments)
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#3Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#4Yeah Google Bard seems to make up stuff way more than chatgpt and gives just wrong code. I asked for numpy code to fit a polyline rejecting outliers and it just made up an argument "robust" for polyfit. Chatgpt on the other hand generated a function that calculated standard deviation and removed points outside two sigma.
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#5Yeah Google Bard seems to make up stuff way more than chatgpt and gives just wrong code. I asked for numpy code to fit a polyline rejecting outliers and it just made up an argument "robust" for polyfit. Chatgpt on the other hand generated a function that calculated standard deviation and removed points outside two sigma.
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#6Barring any AI court case setting a precedent, We're still at 'AI generated works are public domain' aren't we?
There's probably going to be some big money arguing for the right to own content generated by their AI. I can't really see that being in the public interest though.
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#7Yeah Google Bard seems to make up stuff way more than chatgpt and gives just wrong code. I asked for numpy code to fit a polyline rejecting outliers and it just made up an argument "robust" for polyfit. Chatgpt on the other hand generated a function that calculated standard deviation and removed points outside two sigma.
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#8Yeah Google Bard seems to make up stuff way more than chatgpt and gives just wrong code. I asked for numpy code to fit a polyline rejecting outliers and it just made up an argument "robust" for polyfit. Chatgpt on the other hand generated a function that calculated standard deviation and removed points outside two sigma.
Google Bard shamelessly tells my World War II stories[1]. Bing Chat refuses to answer such a question or says “no information” depending on its creativity level. [1] https://twitter.com/esesci/status/1669066574366646274
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#9Is this because of the accuracy of the results, or is it the rights to the content that is the problem? Barring any AI court case setting a precedent, We're still at 'AI generated works are public domain' aren't we? There's probably going to be some big money arguing for the right to own content generated by their AI. I can't really see that being in the public interest though.
I didn't hear we were ever there?
Re: Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard
#10Is this because of the accuracy of the results, or is it the rights to the content that is the problem? Barring any AI court case setting a precedent, We're still at 'AI generated works are public domain' aren't we? There's probably going to be some big money arguing for the right to own content generated by their AI. I can't really see that being in the public interest though.
> We're still at I didn't hear we were ever there?
https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-copyright
"Can AI Art Be Copyrighted? It has long been the posture of the U.S. Copyright Office that there is no copyright protection for works created by non-humans, including machines. Therefore, the product of a generative AI model cannot be copyrighted."