Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for letting me know! I couldn’t find anything about Bitlocker as antivirus but assuming you’re talking about BitDefender (which also has flagged it). I’ve submitted a false positive report.
It looks like a few vendors are flagging the URL. [1] Not sure why. Nothing sticks out at me on urlscan [2] You may have to reach out to those vendors to see what is tickling their detectors. [1] - https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/d4deec9bca49cdedb57d059d9... [2] - https://urlscan.io/result/157fd01c-3442-43ae-a563-77ac7af2dc...
Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
11–20 of 84 posts
Hmm interesting, if anyone can help me track down why I would greatly appreciate it!
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#12Not to confuse with Hurl.dev[1], which is a net request automation tool
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#13Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#14[flagged]
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#15I love this exercise. Great job exploring a concept fully. I find this article one of the better arguments I've seen yet against including exceptions in a language.
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#16This is incredibly funny and also brilliant: toss/return is an implementation of algebraic effects!
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#17This is incredibly funny and also brilliant: toss/return is an implementation of algebraic effects!
call/cc as the only control flow primitive!
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#18To be fair, you did warn
me!
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#19This is incredibly funny and also brilliant: toss/return is an implementation of algebraic effects!
call/cc as the only control flow primitive!
Algebraic effects use delimited continuations (and this appears to match toss/return). Call/cc captures an undelimited continuation. Totally different.
Re: Hurl, a terrible (but cute) idea for a language
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
It looks like a few vendors are flagging the URL. [1] Not sure why. Nothing sticks out at me on urlscan [2] You may have to reach out to those vendors to see what is tickling their detectors. [1] - https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/d4deec9bca49cdedb57d059d9... [2] - https://urlscan.io/result/157fd01c-3442-43ae-a563-77ac7af2dc...
Hmm interesting, if anyone can help me track down why I would greatly appreciate it!
I trust you already obtained the proper licenses from your local authorities before designing and implementing a new programming language? And those licenses are on file with the major security vendors?