The kind of ridiculous situation that arises when a company is drowning in money with no idea what to do about it. Make work for lawyers, Make work for engineers, share buybacks, no good vision on how to spend the money
> no good vision Ah yes, years of continuing technical and product innovations, with "no good vision"
Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
41–50 of 191 posts
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#42The kind of ridiculous situation that arises when a company is drowning in money with no idea what to do about it. Make work for lawyers, Make work for engineers, share buybacks, no good vision on how to spend the money
Funny how 'give more of it to employees' and 'lower prices' aren't really in the vocabulary
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#43It would be fun if they lost also the trademark of any apple-related image, including their silly bitten apple logo. Really, fuck IP and trademark laws. I see it as a net negative. I would rather throw this cursed baby away along with its shit water.
Musicians should earn money from performances not bits.
Painters should earn money from originals not reproductions.
Photographers should earn money from shoots or originals (don't upload a high quality copy to the internet duh).
Everything else is greed. One of the capital sins at that.
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what you're saying is that Apple is infringing on this Swiss company's trademark and must be forced to change their logo before logos with apples are irreversibly associated with Apple instead of the Swiss company?
No kidding. I'd love to see the bigger company loose their logo in one of these petty trademark disputes someday.
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#45The kind of ridiculous situation that arises when a company is drowning in money with no idea what to do about it. Make work for lawyers, Make work for engineers, share buybacks, no good vision on how to spend the money
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Attacking fruit sellers is not "a vision".
Which isn’t what’s happening. A fruit seller has a hypothetical concern over a trademark application, which is how you turn a non story into a story on a slow news day.
Apple is manoeuvring itself into a position where it could
Without any other reasonable explanation for why it should
Except for the one of which Fruit Union is afraid it wouldRe: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#47> THE FRUIT UNION Suisse is 111 years old. For most of its history, it has had as its symbol a red apple with a white cross—the Swiss national flag superimposed on one of its most common fruits. But the group, the oldest and largest fruit farmer’s organization in Switzerland, worries it might have to change its logo, because Apple, the tech giant, is trying to gain intellectual property rights over depictions of appl…
As always, the sound bites obscure the issue. The concern is not the specific request, but how widely trademark is enforceable, which is a question of IP law not Apple’s actions. Apple applied for a design patent for a very specific design and ignorant people flipped out completely misunderstanding the issue. Yet again there’s another story where the details matter and you get articles like this completely glossing o…
https://www3.wipo.int/madrid/monitor/jsp/data.jsp?KEY=ROM_AC... doesn't look like a very specific design to me, but like a pretty generic apple.
> as it applies to electronic devices and a few other narrow categories
This is neither a few nor narrow, imho:
Musical sound recordings;
sound recordings featuring entertainment, music, musicians, documentaries, biographies, interviews, performances, reviews, historical narratives, drama and fiction;
musical video recordings;
musical cinematographic films;
video records and cinematographic films featuring entertainment, music, musicians, caricatures, cartoons, animation, television programs, documentaries, film excerpts, biographies, interviews, performances, reviews, historical narratives, drama and fiction;
sound recordings, video records, cinematographic films, namely, television programs, motion pictures, audio visual records and audio video film footage for television and other transmission;
audio and visual recordings featuring or relating to music, entertainment and films;
pre-recorded compact discs, audio tapes, gramophone records, video tapes, video discs, DVDs, CD-ROMs and interactive compact discs, all featuring or relating to music and films;
digitally recorded sound and video records featuring music, entertainment and cinematographic films;
downloadable musical sound and video records;
downloadable sound and video records featuring or relating to music, entertainment and films.
--
Source: https://www3.wipo.int/madrid/monitor/en/showData.jsp?ID=ROM....
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#48> THE FRUIT UNION Suisse is 111 years old. For most of its history, it has had as its symbol a red apple with a white cross—the Swiss national flag superimposed on one of its most common fruits. But the group, the oldest and largest fruit farmer’s organization in Switzerland, worries it might have to change its logo, because Apple, the tech giant, is trying to gain intellectual property rights over depictions of appl…
There should be a penalty for such bogus trademark claims, best as % of the global revenue. Then, maybe, they would learn that a corporation cannot bully others only because it has unlimited legal resources.
If it was even remotely possible the court would rule "yes, we agree with the plaintiff's arguments that these are similar trademarks, and there is the possibility for consumer confusion, therefore we must check whose trademark has priority... turns out it's the grocers who have used the symbol for 111 years and Apple Computer owe a few billion in back licensing fees" then the lawyers would be terrified of filing the suit.
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#49> THE FRUIT UNION Suisse is 111 years old. For most of its history, it has had as its symbol a red apple with a white cross—the Swiss national flag superimposed on one of its most common fruits. But the group, the oldest and largest fruit farmer’s organization in Switzerland, worries it might have to change its logo, because Apple, the tech giant, is trying to gain intellectual property rights over depictions of appl…
There should be a penalty for such bogus trademark claims, best as % of the global revenue. Then, maybe, they would learn that a corporation cannot bully others only because it has unlimited legal resources.
To me, it sounds like airlines flying empty because they wanted to keep their airport slot: give them a guarantee that they’ll keep their spot and they’ll be happy not to waste fuel and pilot hours on an empty flight.
Re: Apple wants rights to the image of apples in Switzerland
#50[0] https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/markenstreit-cafe-apf...