Live data from Hacker News

Reddit makes r/programming private after top post exposed chatgpt astroturfing

web.archive.org

11–20 of 30 posts

Re: Reddit makes r/programming private after top post exposed chatgpt astroturfing

#12
The link has pretty convincing evidence of astroturfing.

What I don't understand is why take the sub private instead of deleting the post? That's crazy. Were they concerned deleting a post would create more backlash than taking the sub private? Basically the same calculus as a tyrant declaring martial law and expecting the backlash from that to be less than from allowing protests?

Re: Reddit makes r/programming private after top post exposed chatgpt astroturfing

#15

This is an archive from four days ago? What's the news?

It appears someone is using a LLM to make pro-Reddit (ie anti-subreddit-blackout) posts on r/programming. The accounts are all under 30 days old and the posts have that classic milquetoast ChatGPT vibe to them - utterly bland, inoffensive, “safe” posts. If you’ve used ChatGPT you’ll immediately recognize the style.

Tinfoil hat on: spez himself, right into the backend again. v2 will be rolled out to all subreddits then :D

Re: Reddit makes r/programming private after top post exposed chatgpt astroturfing

#17
post #14
post #13

What's "astroturfing"?

You can prob find a better explanation online, but basically faking a “grass roots” movement using bots or a brigade of users. It’s called such since astroturf is fake grass.

So organising a group of bots to influence a decision?

Re: Reddit makes r/programming private after top post exposed chatgpt astroturfing

#19
post #17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can prob find a better explanation online, but basically faking a “grass roots” movement using bots or a brigade of users. It’s called such since astroturf is fake grass.

So organising a group of bots to influence a decision?

Pretty much, it doesn't have to be bots it can also be real people astroturfing something to manipulate public opinion.
Post reply on HN