Maybe this will finally mean a reduction in security theater on the way to the plane. One can hope, anyway.
Probably not. The armoring of cockpit doors already stopped hijackings. I'm a bit baffled as to the benefit of a second one.
FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
11–20 of 56 posts
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#12On current domestic flights the flight door hinges are 2 inches from bathroom hinges. So if there's now the need for two doors (an airlock) will they be lengthening the plane 3 feet to allow for this?
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#13Maybe this will finally mean a reduction in security theater on the way to the plane. One can hope, anyway.
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#14Maybe this will finally mean a reduction in security theater on the way to the plane. One can hope, anyway.
Not a chance. This is more security theater, meant to remind people to be afraid.
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#15Maybe this will finally mean a reduction in security theater on the way to the plane. One can hope, anyway.
Probably not. The armoring of cockpit doors already stopped hijackings. I'm a bit baffled as to the benefit of a second one.
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
the idea is to create an 'air-lock' between openings to prevent a rush towards the cabin opportunistically during an assault when a crew member traverses between the portal. "physical secondary barrier that protects the flightdeck from unauthorized intrusion when the flightdeck door is opened." worst case I suppose you could lock a bad-actor into the in-between until landing? not exactly sure how it'll all be impleme…
Yeah, it’s funny what happens when the pilots need to access the head. The flight attendants move a cart to block the pathway while the cockpit door is open. I tend to agree with FAA that this is an unnecessary vulnerability if we can easily add a secondary secure door between the cabin and the galley.
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#17Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not a chance. This is more security theater, meant to remind people to be afraid.
It's such a ridiculous theater. If a terrorist really wanted to bring down an airplane, nothing the TSA or the airports are currently doing will stop them. There's way too many holes.
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#19The current protocol has the flight attendant block off the aisle with the food cart to block someone from rushing the flight deck. Or at least slow them down enough for the co-pilot to lock the door.
Re: FAA Requires Secondary Flight Deck Barrier
#20It would be cheaper to install a two way drawer on the existing security barrier that would allow flight attendants to pass food and beverage to the cockpit and allow pilots to pass their faeces out.