Earlier quoted context omitted.
internet would be better with total anonymity.
That's one of my favorite parts of reddit. Accounts are just pseudonyms, and you can generate as many as you want. I personally generate a new one every few months, which helps keep too much identifying data from building up over time.
Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
41–50 of 61 posts
Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#42For example, you can load the GitHub Archive to ClickHouse, and it will be accessible with interactive real-time queries: https://ghe.clickhouse.tech/
See also https://til.simonwillison.net/clickhouse/github-explorer
Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#43Was this written by GPT? I was quite interested in the topic of the article but I started to get the brain fog I associate with parsing ChatGPTs convoluted sentences.
Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's one of my favorite parts of reddit. Accounts are just pseudonyms, and you can generate as many as you want. I personally generate a new one every few months, which helps keep too much identifying data from building up over time.
and they're all identifiably attached to your metadata package(s)
Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#45Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#46Was this written by GPT? I was quite interested in the topic of the article but I started to get the brain fog I associate with parsing ChatGPTs convoluted sentences.
Also in the end, unsure of what the actual results are. Maybe I missed clicking on something.
Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#47Caveat: you have to have Snowflake account
Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
note that this is technically against their TOS if not using paid accounts: > One person or legal entity may maintain no more than one free Account (if you choose to control a machine account as well, that's fine, but it can only be used for running a machine) https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-t...
internet would be better with total anonymity.
nostr is allowing for more options
and Jack Dorsey happens to have put up a 1 billion sats bounty to """Create a “complete” Nostr-based suite of git tools, such that projects like bitcoin-core are sufficiently confident to move away from GitHub."""
Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#49Re: Getting 10TB of GitHub logs and extracting details of all users and repositories
#50I'm a big fan of neat statistical analyses, but when I look at the archive site https://www.gharchive.org/ , the overwhelming feeling I have is "creeped out". Taking periodic snapshots of repositories and their issues and wikis sounds good, but do we really need a log of every time someone watches an issue, and every commit message being irrevocably set on public record? That level of details on individual activity s…
Don't blame the archiver who is only doing what is allowed of them by Github. If you don't want to be public don't be public. Other archivers aren't making themselves publicly known but have the data all the same.
Society frequently has norms and unwritten rules that we usually follow. Not every rule needs to be written down as law.