I'd love to see a list of heavily interactive sites that use the HTMX technique. I believe Github uses something like HTMX + ActionCable, and it shows how good that experience can be (and some limitations). But I think it's in the small minority. It'd be nice to know of more examples, instead of just more libs.
UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
51–60 of 194 posts
Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#52Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#53I'd love to see a list of heavily interactive sites that use the HTMX technique. I believe Github uses something like HTMX + ActionCable, and it shows how good that experience can be (and some limitations). But I think it's in the small minority. It'd be nice to know of more examples, instead of just more libs.
Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
A fresh install of NextJS is roughly 150MB. You realise that's mostly code that all needs to work right?
That's all on the backend so it doesn't really matter to me as long as no JS is sent on the frontend. For the benefits NextJS gives me, like TypeScript, I'm fine with that.
Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#55Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#56Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#57I'd love to see a list of heavily interactive sites that use the HTMX technique. I believe Github uses something like HTMX + ActionCable, and it shows how good that experience can be (and some limitations). But I think it's in the small minority. It'd be nice to know of more examples, instead of just more libs.
Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not requiring NPM was one of my original requirements for anything on this list. All of these libraries should be available from HTML directly -- let me know or make a PR if that isn't the case.
Maybe you can add that somewhere in subtitle somehow? as it's not immediately clear
Re: UnsuckJS: Progressively enhance HTML with lightweight JavaScript libraries
#59Awesome list! I love that the cognitive overhead for web apps now is so great many people are "returning to monke" and coding in simple HTML/CSS/JS haha. Question: Shouldn't the items be in the row so I can see all of them at once? Why are the items in the columns? I'll open a issue (:
Maybe! I was messing with different UI approaches to relay this data and this made sense to me, but I'll see if switching to rows is more clear. Thanks for the idea!