Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it

#1

Post by jspencer508 » Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 5:34 PM UTC

Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it
defensenews.com

Re: Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it

#2

Post by zgluck » Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 5:42 PM UTC

Sure, but that's a weird name. There must be a better name for this kind of warfare - how about "flood warfare"?

Re: Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it

#3

Post by jprd » Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 5:55 PM UTC

zgluck wrote: post #2

Sure, but that's a weird name. There must be a better name for this kind of warfare - how about "flood warfare"?

Agreed. I just imagined a bunch of really slow catapults or people using Super Soakers when I saw the title.

Also. F. That.

War is terrible, it is so terrible we created _rules_ for it.

"I will do anything to kill your people, but I won't do that. No I won't do that."

Re: Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it

#4

Post by [deleted] » Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 5:59 PM UTC

jprd wrote: post #3

zgluck wrote: post #2

Sure, but that's a weird name. There must be a better name for this kind of warfare - how about "flood warfare"?

Agreed. I just imagined a bunch of really slow catapults or people using Super Soakers when I saw the title. Also. F. That. War is terrible, it is so terrible we created _rules_ for it. "I will do anything to kill your people, but I won't do that. No I won't do that."

[deleted]