Park Hotels borrowed $725MM interest only and bought property. They haven't been building equity. I believe these mortgages are non-recourse (at worst they can foreclose, not go after you for any extra money). If the property is worth less than the note, there is no reason not to send in the keys. I've seen the same news in the past couple of months in other cities that have seen a run up in recent years.
Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
11–20 of 163 posts
Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#12[flagged]
Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#13[flagged]
Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#14Wolf Richter rips on this article pretty hard: https://wolfstreet.com/2023/06/12/ive-had-it-with-stupid-stu... > Park Hotels failed to pay off a $725 million interest-only non-recourse mortgage that matured last November. The mortgage was secured by two run-down mega-hotels in San Francisco, the 1,921-room Hilton San Francisco Union Square and the 1,024-room Parc 55 San Francisco. > Park Hotels only owns the properti…
Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#15Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#16Me thinks similar things are going to happen (if they're not already) to Portland. I grew up there and then worked on SW 5th Ave from 2013 to 2018 and loved it. Since then I've been in Germany working. I went back last year to see family and my old "stomping grounds" near my old office and other places that I'd love to go eat at and such were overrun with folks with substance abuse issues, homelessness, etc., and man…
Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#17Wolf Richter rips on this article pretty hard: https://wolfstreet.com/2023/06/12/ive-had-it-with-stupid-stu... > Park Hotels failed to pay off a $725 million interest-only non-recourse mortgage that matured last November. The mortgage was secured by two run-down mega-hotels in San Francisco, the 1,921-room Hilton San Francisco Union Square and the 1,024-room Parc 55 San Francisco. > Park Hotels only owns the properti…
Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#18Wolf Richter rips on this article pretty hard: https://wolfstreet.com/2023/06/12/ive-had-it-with-stupid-stu... > Park Hotels failed to pay off a $725 million interest-only non-recourse mortgage that matured last November. The mortgage was secured by two run-down mega-hotels in San Francisco, the 1,921-room Hilton San Francisco Union Square and the 1,024-room Parc 55 San Francisco. > Park Hotels only owns the properti…
Also, Hilton Union Square SF didn't seem 'run down' to me. I just had a conference there two weeks ago. The area around the hotel seems pretty quiet though...
WSJ article seems fine as these things go.
Re: Hotel Owners Start to Write Off San Francisco as Business Nosedives
#19Wolf Richter rips on this article pretty hard: https://wolfstreet.com/2023/06/12/ive-had-it-with-stupid-stu... > Park Hotels failed to pay off a $725 million interest-only non-recourse mortgage that matured last November. The mortgage was secured by two run-down mega-hotels in San Francisco, the 1,921-room Hilton San Francisco Union Square and the 1,024-room Parc 55 San Francisco. > Park Hotels only owns the properti…
They didn't "fail to repay." Nobody ever repays this type of loan. They failed to refinance. And the fact that no one would refinance their $725 million loan means that the property has seriously declined in value.