Live data from Hacker News

McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

retrododo.com

291–300 of 340 posts

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean... yeah. In the meantime you haven't taken anything from that person; they are performing on a public street. On the contrary, similar to a packed restaurant, your presence might signal to others that there is something worth experiencing where you and your friends are crowded. This could in turn benefit the person you're crowded around by bringing more wallets within earshot. So you haven't actually given not…

Yes, the performer would benefit from that attention. Maybe some of the people your presence brings around will tip them, etc. The difference is that the existence of the performer is super obvious while in this case author and their work is hidden so author will not benefit in the same way.

> The difference is

Sure, that does differentiate the two scenarios. I was responding specifically to the first scenario.

I have an arguably bad habit of responding only to specific points that people make in their arguments, while ignoring the rest of their argument until they address the unresolved point. In this case, someone tried to make a point about standing around street performers. I had something to say about it.

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#292
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

nah, people can do whatever they want with it :)

McDonalds makes ~$23 billion per year. You deserve something.

Not everyone does everything with the expectation of seeing their bank account inflated in return. Sometimes people work on things just for the gist of it and I always appreciate seeing something driven solely by legitimate enthusism. :)

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny how people ask this while also being critical on Nintendo. If creator of emulator is to be compensated, are you going to compensate Nintendo as well?

Why would Nintendo be compensated? All the technologies used are re-implementations of their work.

"their work" - enough said.

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would Nintendo be compensated? All the technologies used are re-implementations of their work.

"their work" - enough said.

Lol should open source projects pay commercial vendors? They are recreating "their work" right?

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, the performer would benefit from that attention. Maybe some of the people your presence brings around will tip them, etc. The difference is that the existence of the performer is super obvious while in this case author and their work is hidden so author will not benefit in the same way.

> The difference is Sure, that does differentiate the two scenarios. I was responding specifically to the first scenario. I have an arguably bad habit of responding only to specific points that people make in their arguments, while ignoring the rest of their argument until they address the unresolved point. In this case, someone tried to make a point about standing around street performers. I had something to say abo…

I see, I took it as objection to the bigger point, because many probably do the same if you want to avoid misunderstanding you can keep doing what you're doing just with a clarification that you have no strong opinion on the issue

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, the performer would benefit from that attention. Maybe some of the people your presence brings around will tip them, etc. The difference is that the existence of the performer is super obvious while in this case author and their work is hidden so author will not benefit in the same way.

The author is also hidden from anyone who would be authorizing payment. The only person involved who might know the author is the guy making the game, and they likely used what leverage they had on their own contract.

based on what I know about other engineers it's almost certain that no one used any leverage whatsoever and the only reason they even checked the license is because legal forced them

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#299
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you familiar with normcore? There's an argument to be made that the most counterculture thing you can do is to semi-ironically eat a Happy Meal in order to support indie Gameboy devs

> the most counterculture thing you can do is to semi-ironically eat a Happy Meal in order to support indie Gameboy devs Like Winston at the Chestnut Tree Cafe

Yes. Only once you truly love eating your big mac will the hamburgalar murder you.

Re: McDonald's just dropped a brand new Game Boy game

#300
post #88

This isn't even the first legitimately interesting video game connection to McDonalds, weirdly. Treasure is an influential game development studio that did a lot of really interesting work in the mid to late 90s, responsible for games like Gunstar Heroes, Radiant Silvergun, Ikaruga, Bangai-o, Silhouette Mirage, Dynamite Headdy, Mischief Makers, Alien Soldier, and others. They were a bunch of ex-Konami developers (who…

Not even the only McDonald's branded game of the era! I played MC Kids growing up on NEWS and it also was a dramatically better game than it had any right to be. Not quite the same storied history but still recommend playing if you're looking for some hidden NES gems. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nKywTkMnAs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.C._Kids

The guy who programmed MC Kids did a writeup on the game's engineering that serves as a wonderful introduction to programming for the NES.

https://games.greggman.com/game/programming_m_c__kids/

Post reply on HN