Live data from Hacker News

Xerox scanners randomly alter numbers in scanned documents (2013)

dkriesel.com

61–63 of 63 posts

Re: Xerox scanners randomly alter numbers in scanned documents (2013)

#61
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When Apple introduced a fingerprint unlock in the home button, it wanted to keep the fingerprint scans secure. The security chip that stores the fingerprint scans needs to verify that the home button's fingerprint scanner is trustworthy, to prevent man in the middle attacks. However, when an unauthorized or unofficial button is used as a replacement for repair, the phone will permanently brick itself. No warning is g…

As a user, that’s what I’d want it to do. If someone is trying to bypass the fingerprint sensor by replacing it because they know that’s where the authorization is stored, that’s exactly what I’d want the phone to do.

The fingerprint scanner is just a scanner, it doesn't handle authorization, that's what the security chip does. The scanner has two ways of communicating with the security chip. It can authenticate itself with the chip, and it can send the chip images of fingerprints.

If a compromised scanner fails to authenticate, then the security chip can just ignore the scanner. Not much it can do if its only avenue of communication is cut off. A warning message telling users to not touch their compromised fingerprint scanner would have been sufficient.

Re: Xerox scanners randomly alter numbers in scanned documents (2013)

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PRISM didn't kill companies, Apple home button scandal didn't touch it, sony infecting its users with a rootkit didn't make it sell less playstations, HP lying cartridges had no impact on its long term business... Fines and green washing are budgeted and only a small fractions of the profit they make by misbehaving. On this very site you can read regularly people telling you we should forget about the MS of the past…

I can see the other things but "Apple home button scandal" either does not belong in the same league or there might be something I do not know about. Can you expand a little bit on your thinking?

The the home button scandal I'm talking about is older than that.

Circa 2010-15, the iphone home button was having more and more problem: https://osxdaily.com/2011/12/22/iphone-home-button-not-worki...

For a while, half the users were just using a software button as a workaround: https://osxdaily.com/2012/07/02/broken-iphone-home-button-as...

It was funny to see everyone with a very expensive phone just moving around this fake button everywhere on their screen because their physical button was not working.

But then people stopped finding it funny.

Because Apple said it was a hardware problem, and said the fix was to buy the next iphone generation.

However, a few weeks later, jailbreak iphone received a patch from the community fixing the home button problem, showing not only that it was a software issue that was easy to fix, but Apple just conned their entire customer base.

Post reply on HN