Earlier quoted context omitted.
Semi-related: if you ever feel the need to report times to a global audience, not only make sure to always report the timezone (even if it is the same as the user's), but also use UTC offsets rather than timezone names. Life is too short to remember what each timezone name means and converting to it, UTC offsets are much easier on the mental calculator.
It's also not too complicated to add a few lines of javascript that show the datet/time in the user's local time zone (via Date.getTimezoneOffset) as well.
AWS us-east-1 down
251–260 of 331 posts
Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#252Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#253Mysterious lack of "AWS is bad for the internet because it is so centralized" dialog up in here. edit: for those that would downvote: HN _just_ yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36295352 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36295305
It's a mob mentality. Safety in numbers. "Oh well, my site is down but so is my neighbour's so nobody will be that mad about it."
Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's also not too complicated to add a few lines of javascript that show the datet/time in the user's local time zone (via Date.getTimezoneOffset) as well.
Honestly this is the worst when there is no timezone marker and some times are in browser time and others arent
Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#255Toast POS is down 100%, don't go out to lunch.
As a side note, I wonder if businesses won't even accept cash if they can't go through their POS system. If not, it's a shame that these modern internet connected POSs lock out stuff like that.
For example, in Poland, your typical restaurant or shop needs to generate tax receipt (as well as properly calculate the tax), and uses either a separate receipt POS device, or POS with appropriate receipt printer (the devices are certified and for example do simultaneous two prints - one for client one for seller - or use digitally-signed storage for seller copy).
If the POS isn't designed properly to operate in case of network failure... welp, can't take cash either, at least not legally.
Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
Back when we had servers in an onsite DC we lost a raid card and the system I was developing went down. We had the fancy support so a tech was out with the card replaced in a couple hours, then we had to restore from tape backup. All in all, a non-critical system was down for most of a business day. My bosses boss stormed in, upset he couldn't pull a report, and asked how do we prevent this in the future. I responded…
That sounds nice. My boss's boss is usually the one storming in, and he usually says "okay let's do it", and then I have to implement it in a week...
Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#257Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#258https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status reports: Increased Error Rates and Latencies Jun 13 12:08 PM PDT We are investigating increased error rates and latencies in the US-EAST-1 Region. They list Lambda as the only affected service
certificate manager also down (I know because I tried to update an ssl cert for cloudfront which only allows US-East-1 ssl certs, maybe someone will eventually fix that to allow any region to have the ssl cert for cloudfront)
This seems like an odd limitation. Do you know the technical reason?
Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#259i find it stupid that clients get to know about regions at all. They should only notice latency hits and batch job queuing latency if something bad happens underneath, but no services should go down.
Re: AWS us-east-1 down
#260Mysterious lack of "AWS is bad for the internet because it is so centralized" dialog up in here. edit: for those that would downvote: HN _just_ yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36295352 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36295305
Ok fine. Running your own datacenter in 2023 is incredibly risky. There's the upfront server cost and the ongoing maintenance cost. There's patches and staffing and disaster planning and all the other things that goes into it. Plus there's the cyberinsurance and protections and security components too. Do you really think other (smaller) orgs can do a better job at hosting a datacenter than Amazon / Google / Microsof…
Amazon et al even contract with them.
But cloud isn’t selling rented rackspace; it’s selling APIs for billions of things. Much different.