Earlier quoted context omitted.
> As it stands I don't make any money on this, I just do it for fun. But with a site like non.io there's no reason for me _not_ to post my content there. I’m obviously not targeting this at you but a business model likes this (paying fractions of a penny per upvote) is not likely to attract high quality content. In fact the opposite it incentives a quantity over quality approach (i.e. content has to be just good enou…
What if there was a large button for upvote, and beside a smaller button for 100x upvote? Regular users can upvote 100 cat pictures for their dopamine hit, and when they find an ACTUALLY VALUABLE post they can look for the small button.
Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
471–480 of 619 posts
Re: Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
#472Earlier quoted context omitted.
If everyone chips in $1, and their $1 is split between all the things they’ve upvoted, isn’t the financial incentive to produce posts that are upvoted by people who don’t typically upvote? That actually seems like a pretty interesting incentive.
Yes it seems quite clever. People who upvote zero effort memes willy nilly will spread their share thin.
Re: Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
#473Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I want a site that rewards quality, not view counts. That's what the objective of the site is. Viewing doesn't reward anything (whereas views do reward in the video you just linked). My hope as well is that for nonio, knowing you're contributing a share of your monthly pool will make people more conscientious about what they upvote, thus improving quality.
As an option, to rank items, you can use the amount of money that the item has earned instead of just the number of upvotes. You can even replace upvotes number in the UI as well. This way frequent meme-upvoters will have less sway over more picky users. It'd be easier to register astroturfing accounts and to promote something to the top, though.
Re: Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
#474I think it's fine if you realize that the value lies in the community, not the platform itself. Online communities used to cluster around the 31 flavors of forum/web BBS, so if you have interesting topics to build a small community around your software may flourish based on those.
Re: Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
#475Earlier quoted context omitted.
> “ it has a business model ” What’s that story about the economist who was trying to concentrate but there were kids playing soccer below his window and being noisy, so he went out and offered them $1 each if they come back and played tomorrow. The next day he offered them 50c, then 25c, and after that 5c, and the kids got annoyed “we wouldn’t come here to play for a measly five cents!” and stormed off, and didn’t c…
Daniel Ariely had a great analogy for this: Your grandmother cooks an amazing dinner each Thanksgiving, for nothing but your love and thanks. If at the end of the meal you said, “Great dinner, Gran, here’s for your trouble,” and handed her a $20, how do you think she’d react?
But this does suggest that it would be different to comment on a board like this. People wouldn’t just be making comments for the joy of discussion, they would be making comments with their hands out for a tip.
I think this incentivizes low investment drive-by comments, but perhaps this could be fixed as well. For example, you don’t have to display the actual upvotes/downvotes score of a comment, you can display and sort by a score which is a function of those things and additional information about the quality of that comment, incentivizing comments which are both popular and insightful.
Re: Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
#476Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has been tried in the cryptocurrency space, people start faking accounts to upvote their content and make money. So basically what already happens with reddit/twitter/etc but amplified because you give them a direct financial incentive to upvote low effort crap.
That doesn't really work when they have to pay for each account they use to upvote though. Even if they boost their own post a bit for it to get the attention of others, they're still paying $2 per upvote for that. And if their post is no good, people might even just cancel those out with downvotes.
Re: Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
#477Earlier quoted context omitted.
100% agree with everything said here. My original plan was to pay for ~100 users accounts and seed the site with content for a proper launch. Given what's happening today though, it felt at least pertinent to show off the current state and get some feedback. The balance between splash page on landing / landing on content is a hard one, but I think you're right. I am worried though that without conveying the initial b…
you should try and get an API that has full parity with Reddit, an app that does that will replace Reddit because all third party apps simply need to change urls for Reddit to your domain.
Re: Show HN: Non.io, a Reddit-like platform Ive been working on for the last 4 years
#478Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mostly agree. The screenshot in the top right looks good, like professional app I might actually use. But I want to actually browse the site and check it out without first slogging through a registration process. If it’s free to view/browse anyway, then enable doing that without registering. Register and pay if you want to post. Edit: You can browse without registering after all, here’s the link: https://non.io/#all…
Oof, I clicked one of those posts and immediately lost all back-button functionality to an endless stream of history events.