Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
111–120 of 517 posts
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#112This is just bananas to me that a browser would perform "super resolution" at all, much less by default . Couldn't this wreak havoc on doing things like viewing medical images, inserting false detail that isn't there? As well as on text in images, e.g. inventing a cleanly readable but hallucinated license plate number on a car, or financial figure, where the original is blurry? Not only does this seem like a terribly…
This has already happened with copiers, which because of a bug in a compression algorithm, would randomly change figures when copying
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately brave is forever cemented in my mind as being linked to the brave shitcoin.
Is the Brave shitcoin really worse than all the stupid-ass stunts and services Mozilla has pulled over the years?
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s crazy. I used Edge when it first switched to Chromium because it was a nice, clean Chrome alternative with working sync. Today it’s obvious Microsoft can’t be trusted. This “feature” is insane and it makes me concerned about what Windows might be doing in the background.
Reminder that MS owns GitHub, LinkedIn, and Mojang.
The real danger. (almost unironically though)
I can switch OS, Office is almost obsolete with google + free stuff, their browser/software is terrible and never used, Github(yikes, well, git works..), LinkedIn(and nothing of value was lost).
So we really are at the whim of M$ when it comes to Github and Minecraft. Scary. But hey, I used to be obsessed with Nintendo games, and now people have Zelda clones so I don't need to pay games that are graded on the Nintendo Curve.
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#115This is just bananas to me that a browser would perform "super resolution" at all, much less by default . Couldn't this wreak havoc on doing things like viewing medical images, inserting false detail that isn't there? As well as on text in images, e.g. inventing a cleanly readable but hallucinated license plate number on a car, or financial figure, where the original is blurry? Not only does this seem like a terribly…
Indeed, this sounds like a bad idea not just for the user but for the image host as well. If I post a picture, I post it the way I want it to be seen. I don't want the browser to arbitrarily reinterpret it.
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#1161. Go to your favorite search engine
2. Download a different browser
3. Never use Edge again
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sending medical images to Microsoft seems like a major HIPAA violation.
> Sending medical images to Microsoft seems like a major HIPAA violation. Without sounding to condescending: Bro... this entire Industry still relies on using fax or snailmail for records. Using slow, leaky, non-private/seure channels for sensitive information is not as much of a concern to this field than one thinks if you've been in the belly of the beast. Ask anyone who has spent anytime doing IT work at a hospita…
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's free if you're willing to break the EULA. I haven't paid for it. Just used some Win 7 CD key I found online and it activated.
Not even break EULA, just download from Microsoft and install without activating.
"You are authorized to use this software only if you are properly licensed and the software has been properly activated with a genuine product key or by other authorized method."
Re: Edge sends images you view online to Microsoft
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sending medical images to Microsoft seems like a major HIPAA violation.
> Sending medical images to Microsoft seems like a major HIPAA violation. Without sounding to condescending: Bro... this entire Industry still relies on using fax or snailmail for records. Using slow, leaky, non-private/seure channels for sensitive information is not as much of a concern to this field than one thinks if you've been in the belly of the beast. Ask anyone who has spent anytime doing IT work at a hospita…
>They are so fast(no they arent, something can be ahead of them)
>They are safe compared to email(literally anyone can walk by the fax and take it)
>They are faster than a phone call, because doctors don't pick up the phone. (What...)
You can mention the US government has ultra high security communication that uses the internet, you can mention the value of finance information, you can talk about the secrets your billion dollar company sends over email/web. But noooo, patient information is too sensitive and urgent to be sent over email/web....