Once the temporal fixes are applied, the residual morphing and flickering actually quite appeals to me. Reminds me of the animation style in A Scanner Darkly.
And to think ASD was entirely hand rotoscoped!
Video to video with Stable Diffusion
91–100 of 110 posts
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
You apparently can't use anything to do with automatic-111 webui from colab, don't remember the exact restriction but I hear even if you do a simple, print with the word it freaks out..
You can with paid Colab. You just can't on the free tier.
cool, I have the pro, haven't tried it myself.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are saying that there is no need to figure out how to recreate "the "glitch" of today that will be the nostalgic style of tomorrow" as the "old"/current models are all available on GitHub and huggingface, and will be in the future. There is no need to figure out how to recreate this style as you will be able to find it on these platforms in the future. The commenter understood you, but you did not understand the…
Yes. Because of the way reply notifications come in I thought it was a reply to a different comment. But I still think that's missing the point of my (not entirely serious) comment. People still have access to analogue amplifiers but digital simulations of them are still developed. As models and workflows improve, if people want a flickery old-school look then they may well simulate it rather than go through the hass…
> People still have access to analogue amplifiers but digital simulations of them are still developed.
That's because analog stuff requires hardware. There's "something to simulate". You don't simulate digital computers, perhaps you "emulate" them.
More generally, analog stuff is really different from digital stuff. Some "audiophiles" argue about which lossless compression algorithm applied to .wav files gives the best sound, but we know it's just bits. Bits are fungible. By contrast, you can never make a perfect copy of something analog (you can often make a copy that's indistinguishable for all purposes that matter, but there's still a difference). People still make and buy LPs, the sales are increasing. I don't expect that to ever happen for CDs, unless perhaps combined with scratching or otherwise damaging them on purpose.
Of course, nostalgia goes beyond such mundane distinctions, which gives rise to thingsike pixel art. But there's still nothing to simulate there.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#94[dead]
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#95I was going to get a 4090 this year, but I just don't think 24gb VRAM is going to bee enough in the short term future(for AI related stuff). Ended up getting a 3060 for 1/4 of the cost, and I'm planning on using/paying for Colab until some 6090 comes out with 128gb vram. Something that kind of bothers me that I don't understand. Why is there such an obsession about having small computers/servers? I don't care if I ha…
I agree we need more VRAM. I wish someone would combine a GTX 960 level processor made on modern lithography (to cut power draw) with 32GB of low power GDDR VRAM and try to fit it in a single slot. 1x DP connector would be fine. I agree about small computers. The rich folks in NY City and Silicon Valley set the trends, and real estate is expensive there. Also, graphic arts people make advertisements, and they want PC…
They made a 2 slot, 24GB ram card with the same chip as on the GTX 980 Ti, called the Quadro M6000.
They're still around US$650 on Ebay though, unlike the 12GB variant of that card (much, much cheaper). Random example:
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/255069557859
---
Digging around a bit more, it looks like there's a "Tesla M40" card of the same generation with 24GB ram. Seems to be quite a few of those on Ebay for around US$150-200.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#96I was going to get a 4090 this year, but I just don't think 24gb VRAM is going to bee enough in the short term future(for AI related stuff). Ended up getting a 3060 for 1/4 of the cost, and I'm planning on using/paying for Colab until some 6090 comes out with 128gb vram. Something that kind of bothers me that I don't understand. Why is there such an obsession about having small computers/servers? I don't care if I ha…
> Why is there such an obsession about having small computers/servers?
Space. Most people don't have room for a closet sized computer, or if they do they can't justify using the space that way instead of for something else. Also cost of materials for a case: to sell generally you need to properly deal with EMI.
Most of the cost is in the RAM and CPUs/GPUs, which beyond a certain point you simply don't need a bigger unit to fit in. If you are wanting to build up more compute power the usual way is to get a rack in that cabinet worth of space and put separate machines in there (that generally means low profile high-density kit with cooling solutions that are not optimised for quietness, but I'm sure water cooled options are available too).
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#97The end result look like a a cartoon filter applied frame by frame. Or, each frame is basically going through stable diffusion in photo mode
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#98The Temporal Kit write up was amazing.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#99Does anyone else find it weird that a huge amount of AI video/imagery in tutorials etc seem to be sexy anime schoolgirls? I'm a bloke, I've never been that particularly bothered by like, Lara Croft, Lena, muscular guys in action games etc, I get it, I want to look at idealized/attractive things as much as the next person, but something about this makes me super uncomfortable.
You're not alone.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#100Does anyone else find it weird that a huge amount of AI video/imagery in tutorials etc seem to be sexy anime schoolgirls? I'm a bloke, I've never been that particularly bothered by like, Lara Croft, Lena, muscular guys in action games etc, I get it, I want to look at idealized/attractive things as much as the next person, but something about this makes me super uncomfortable.
[deleted]