Did they finally fix the annoying flickering?
Video to video with Stable Diffusion
11–20 of 110 posts
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#12Not going to bother with this until the temporal cohesion issue is solved. The results are cool, but the variety in frames makes it look like a very specific and distracting art style instead of true animation.
Mark my words. In a few years people will be writing filters and trying to figure out how to recreate the look of early AI animation.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#13Isn't runway vid2vid superior in the aspect of coherency? This flickering is horrible.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#14It's insane the speed of progress. That being said, the most smooth example in that tutorial (Temporal Kit) required a lot of outside processing. I wonder if AUTOMATIC1111 ui will start handling workflow scripts, a.l.a blender workflow boxes.
There is another UI for workflow scripts: https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI Give it enough times and it will also have the UI simplicity of automatic1111 UI.
automatic1111 isn't what immediately springs to mind when I hear the phrase "UI simplicity"
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#15Isn't runway vid2vid superior in the aspect of coherency? This flickering is horrible.
Yes but people want to run stuff on their own hardware or at least have a deep ability to configure and mix and match tools.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#16Once the temporal fixes are applied, the residual morphing and flickering actually quite appeals to me. Reminds me of the animation style in A Scanner Darkly.
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#17Not going to bother with this until the temporal cohesion issue is solved. The results are cool, but the variety in frames makes it look like a very specific and distracting art style instead of true animation.
Mark my words. In a few years people will be writing filters and trying to figure out how to recreate the look of early AI animation.
...why? Do you expect GitHub and HuggingFace to go under in a few years?
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#18[flagged]
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mark my words. In a few years people will be writing filters and trying to figure out how to recreate the look of early AI animation.
...why? Do you expect GitHub and HuggingFace to go under in a few years?
The poster is just saying that "the "glitch" of today will be the nostalgic style of tomorrow".
Re: Video to video with Stable Diffusion
#20Not going to bother with this until the temporal cohesion issue is solved. The results are cool, but the variety in frames makes it look like a very specific and distracting art style instead of true animation.
Mark my words. In a few years people will be writing filters and trying to figure out how to recreate the look of early AI animation.
Yes, just look at the amount of reviews of old cameras on YouTube! Of course, this is software so it will be easier to find than an old camera or lens but I am also sure it will also be celebrated as a timeless genre.