Anyone can get the performance crown by having an unlimited energy budget. Performance per watt is much more valuable in data centers (TCO) and consumer devices (battery life).
Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
11–20 of 448 posts
Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#1250% slower than the absolute best of class NVIDIA discrete GPU offering that consumes massively more wattage is hardly a damning statement.
I don't think it was ever meant to be the most informative article: it seems written to serve the contrarians because that's profitable from a readership perspective for a publication like this.
Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#1350% slower than the absolute best of class NVIDIA discrete GPU offering that consumes massively more wattage is hardly a damning statement.
A 4080 is best of class?
And second of all, for the price it should be compared to the 4090, which absolutely demolishes it.
Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#14Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#1550% slower than the absolute best of class NVIDIA discrete GPU offering that consumes massively more wattage is hardly a damning statement.
granted, wccftech is a grain of salt kind of site. To wit, here's another article....from the same site! https://wccftech.com/m2-ultra-only-10-percent-slower-than-rt...
Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#16I’m also disappointed that Apple didn’t go for a 2-socket Mac Pro so they could offer a compute advantage over Mac Studio in addition to the PCI Express slots. Other than the IO, I can’t think of a reason to pick the Mac Pro.
Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#17Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#18Ahhaha, Intel's TDP is 2-4 times bigger under full load (and I guess ~10-15x under moderate load) while having negligible perf advantage over M2. The author can not be serious.
Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#19The article mentions that apple has focused on single core performance while the x86 processors in question are designed for multi core use cases. This reflects two different markets being addressed and the sad state (small amount) of multicore code today.
Also it’s silly to claim that the M2 Ultra is so expensive — you can get the same performance from a 3K “studio” desktop that you do from the >7K “Mac Pro”.
I use apple for all my “terminals” (macs, iPhone, etc) but really want AMD and Intel to keep working on these multithreaded powerhouses because I depend on that on the cloud side. I don’t see this ever being in Apple’s markets. Articles that further that are needed, but this isn’t one of them.
Re: Apple M2 Ultra SoC isn’t faster than AMD and Intel last year desktop CPUs
#20Hint: M2 destroys the competition