Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

news.ycombinator.com

151–160 of 330 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#151

Usenet thrived in a time where most of us trusted each other, traffic was an order of magnitude lighter, trolls were few, spam was unheard of, and moderation - if any - was cheap and painless. I honestly believe those times are past us. And I say that as someone that loved Usenet back in the day. What you're asking for, for free , isn't possible.

The costs of transporting Usenet weren't zero, they were simply borne by your ISP because it was understood as a necessary part of internet access. I think that's what we're missing here. If we simply paid for this stuff as part of our regular internet bill again, we could solve a lot of the "nothing works for free" problems.

> The costs of transporting Usenet weren't zero

Famously so. "This message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of dollars."

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#152
> 3. These forums should encourage less anonymity and more persistent communication.

Why should this be applied to all of the groups/forums? I thought Facebook already showed that the whole "Anonymous people act worse" thing was bullshit, shitty people will be shitty people even if they have their real name attached to it. It should at least be up to each community to decide if they want to allow anonymous users or not.

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Relevant Penny Arcade, literally 22 frickin' years ago: https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2001/06/22/magic-its-what...

That must be a reply to Scott McCloud's "Reinventing Comics". It came out July 25, 2000 and this strip is from June 22, 2001 (under a year later). One part of the book was about micropayments. Edit: oh yeah, obviously it is. The character talking is Scott McCloud's character, and it's titled "I can't stop talking" and Scott's webcomic at the time was called "I can't stop thinking". In fact they must be replies to the…

Jesus Christ his comics are long winded.

I guess attention spans have shrunk or I’m less tolerant of another ‘some guys opinion’ now they are spouted at me 24/7 or it’s the fact that there’s more than six webcomics to read.

Can’t imagine this comic being very successful nowadays.

Having said all that he was being mocked contemporaneously so it’s not just me!

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think a major component of the difference between contributing then and contributing now is friction/skill/interest. Back then, you had to be specifically interested in learning how to get connected, which was a niche endeavor, while the masses were oblivious or too cool for school. Now, you can simply join almost any online community using baseline skills that an enormous fraction of Earth's population already has…

I remember having to resort to submitting a post to alt.tech-support.recovery using a text editor and a raw telnet session due to the "lay-an-egg" requirement for posts to be accepted there and I didn't have software that would let me fiddle with headers in a sane fashion. HN most certainly does not achieve this level of filtration.

I am very curious but my search-fu has failed me. What was the requirement? Is there a link or jargon file or something I could read? I love this kind of stuff.

Thanks!

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#157

Why not just independent forum sites like 1998-2008. I was a member of 10 or so very specific forums where I could get expert advice very quickly. That is in the rare event that my problem hadn't already been discussed in great detail with highly detailed walk throughs. Then each of those forums had a marketplace where you could buy pretty much anything relevant to that interest at great values with scams being prett…

Since independent forums never went anywhere, you have to ask yourself why Reddit still "won". In other words, if indie forums are so compelling, why didn't they prevent the success of Reddit?

Single sign on across a bunch of forums was always a holy grail. Users don't want to register for 10 forums either. I remember EZBoard (a free forum host in the early 2000s) had an EZBoard Gold membership where you paid monthly for SSO across all EZBoard forums instead of having to register on each forum.

Traditional ads (Adsense) are pretty much dead on forums except for breaking even + pocket change. And unless your forum attracts a lot of guests, you're stuck in the position of showing increasingly crappy ads to your own users, and of them the few users not running ad block. It's kinda cruel.

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The costs of transporting Usenet weren't zero, they were simply borne by your ISP because it was understood as a necessary part of internet access. I think that's what we're missing here. If we simply paid for this stuff as part of our regular internet bill again, we could solve a lot of the "nothing works for free" problems.

> The costs of transporting Usenet weren't zero Famously so. "This message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of dollars."

Back when we were going to charge a postage stamp for every email

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Advertiser revenue dropped like a cliff in 2008 era. Facebook advertisements were far more valuable than AdSense whatever from your smaller forums. Today, you will never have the revenues of the 90s or 00s era, and likely never again as long as Facebook and Youtube have eaten up the bulk of advertising eyeballs and dollars. 2. Moderation back then was far harder. There was far more spam to deal with those forum-si…

I can't speak to ad revenue, but I helped with managing some large ~100k member forums and the cost wasn't by any means prohibitive. Costs today would be cheaper by a couple orders of magnitude. Spam wasn't a big problem either. Basic filters, and mandatory intro posts and post count restricted forums solved most issues. Moderation was much more focused on keeping things in topic and redirecting duplicate topics.

Yeah you can easily host a phpbb or vbulletin or whatever still exists these days on a single dedicated server (ovh or hetzner) and be able to serve 100k MAU for about 50-75 USD/month.

Hell, for less than 10k MAU you can still get away with shared hosting if you're really strapped for cash, 5-7 bucks per month.

People around here really lost perspective of what can be accomplished with a dedicated box and a PHP forum.

You don't need kubernetes to handle 12 AWS instances in 3 regions, with S3 storage and distributed RDS with a side dish of lambdas to run your 45 microservices.

Re: Ask HN: Is it time to resurrect a Usenet clone?

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The costs of transporting Usenet weren't zero […] How expensive was Usenet if you took out storage/bandwidth for alt.binaries.*?

It's an almost irrelevant question because as soon as most nodes would stop carrying alt.binaries, posters would no longer respect the convention that binaries should go there, because users would want the data regardless of what their provider wants. Them it's a cat and mouse game like everything else, where binaries would just be split up more and obfuscated more. When the cost of storage and compute isn't really b…

bytes limits were overcome by segmenting rar files while including CRCs to overcome incomplete rar sequences.

sharing of binaries will always happen. even if it's just to include a cat image (we all know that's not all, but just sayin).

Post reply on HN